0 17

Cited 0 times in

Three-axis load analysis of high-speed handpiece on dental training teeth and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing blocks

Authors
 Bora Lee  ;  Juyeon Hwang  ;  Jung-Hwa Lim  ;  Jong-Eun Kim  ;  June-Sung Shim  ;  Yooseok Shin 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, Vol.155 : 106552, 2024-04 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS
ISSN
 1751-6161 
Issue Date
2024-04
MeSH
Computer-Aided Design* ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical Phenomena ; Mechanical Tests ; Tooth / physiology
Keywords
CAD/CAM ; Dental handpiece ; Dental training teeth ; Load analysis
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of dental training teeth with subtractive and additive computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials used to fabricate dental simulation models. Therefore, the three-axis load generated during cutting movements, including drilling and milling performed using a dental handpiece, was measured and compared. The samples were cut vertically downward by 1.5 mm, horizontally by 6 mm, and vertically upward at a constant speed (1 mm/s), while the rotational speed of the bur was maintained at 200,000 rotations per minute. A three-axis load cell was used to measure the X-, Y-, and Z-axis loads on the specimen. The median value of the X-, Y-, and Z-axis measurements and the resultant load during the vertical-downward, horizontal, and vertical-upward movements were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test. For vertical downward movement, the drilling force of the dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic® and similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate. In contrast to subtractive CAD/CAM blocks, the drilling force of the dental training teeth was higher than that of 3D-printed resin blocks. Regarding horizontal movement, the milling force of dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic®. In contrast, the milling force of Nissin was similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate, while that of Frasaco was lower. Furthermore, compared to additive CAD/CAM blocks, the milling force of the dental training teeth was higher than that of 3D-printed resin blocks. Regarding vertical upward movement, the resultant loads of dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic®. Similarly, the resultant load of Nissin was similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate, while that of Frasaco was lower. Additionally, compared to additive CAD/CAM blocks, the resultant loads of the dental training teeth were similar to those of the 3D-printed resin blocks. © 2024
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612400184X
DOI
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106552
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Dental Education (치의학교육학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Conservative Dentistry (보존과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jong Eun(김종은) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7834-2524
Shin, Yoo Seok(신유석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-2570
Shim, June Sung(심준성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-0122
Lee, Bora(이보라) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-9803
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200004
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links