0 17

Cited 0 times in

Three-axis load analysis of high-speed handpiece on dental training teeth and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing blocks

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김종은-
dc.contributor.author신유석-
dc.contributor.author심준성-
dc.contributor.author이보라-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T05:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-18T05:07:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.issn1751-6161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200004-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of dental training teeth with subtractive and additive computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials used to fabricate dental simulation models. Therefore, the three-axis load generated during cutting movements, including drilling and milling performed using a dental handpiece, was measured and compared. The samples were cut vertically downward by 1.5 mm, horizontally by 6 mm, and vertically upward at a constant speed (1 mm/s), while the rotational speed of the bur was maintained at 200,000 rotations per minute. A three-axis load cell was used to measure the X-, Y-, and Z-axis loads on the specimen. The median value of the X-, Y-, and Z-axis measurements and the resultant load during the vertical-downward, horizontal, and vertical-upward movements were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test. For vertical downward movement, the drilling force of the dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic® and similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate. In contrast to subtractive CAD/CAM blocks, the drilling force of the dental training teeth was higher than that of 3D-printed resin blocks. Regarding horizontal movement, the milling force of dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic®. In contrast, the milling force of Nissin was similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate, while that of Frasaco was lower. Furthermore, compared to additive CAD/CAM blocks, the milling force of the dental training teeth was higher than that of 3D-printed resin blocks. Regarding vertical upward movement, the resultant loads of dental training teeth was lower than that of Vita Enamic®. Similarly, the resultant load of Nissin was similar to that of Lava™ Ultimate, while that of Frasaco was lower. Additionally, compared to additive CAD/CAM blocks, the resultant loads of the dental training teeth were similar to those of the 3D-printed resin blocks. © 2024-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHComputer-Aided Design*-
dc.subject.MESHMaterials Testing-
dc.subject.MESHMechanical Phenomena-
dc.subject.MESHMechanical Tests-
dc.subject.MESHTooth / physiology-
dc.titleThree-axis load analysis of high-speed handpiece on dental training teeth and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing blocks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBora Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJuyeon Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Hwa Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong-Eun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJune-Sung Shim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYooseok Shin-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106552-
dc.contributor.localIdA00927-
dc.contributor.localIdA02129-
dc.contributor.localIdA02211-
dc.contributor.localIdA05593-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03939-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-0180-
dc.identifier.pmid38701678-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612400184X-
dc.subject.keywordCAD/CAM-
dc.subject.keywordDental handpiece-
dc.subject.keywordDental training teeth-
dc.subject.keywordLoad analysis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jong Eun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김종은-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신유석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor심준성-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이보라-
dc.citation.volume155-
dc.citation.startPage106552-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, Vol.155 : 106552, 2024-04-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Dental Education (치의학교육학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Conservative Dentistry (보존과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.