Cited 0 times in

Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography

Authors
 Kyu-Chong Lee  ;  Jin-Kyem Kim  ;  Dong-Kyu Kim 
Citation
 TOMOGRAPHY, Vol.10(7) : 1031-1041, 2024-07 
Journal Title
 TOMOGRAPHY 
Issue Date
2024-07
MeSH
Abdomen / diagnostic imaging ; Abdomen / pathology ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Gallbladder / diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder / pathology ; Gallbladder Diseases / diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Diseases / pathology ; Gallbladder Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging ; Gallbladder Neoplasms / pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Polyps* / diagnostic imaging ; Polyps* / pathology ; Radiologists* ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography* / methods
Keywords
gallbladder ; polyps ; reproducibility of results ; ultrasonography
Abstract
Background: There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US).

Aim: To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US.

Methods: From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader.

Results: Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers.

Conclusions: GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.
Files in This Item:
T202404394.pdf Download
DOI
10.3390/tomography10070077
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Dong Kyu(김동규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7322-2550
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200169
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links