63 248

Cited 0 times in

Cited 2 times in

Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyu-Chong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin-Kyem-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong-Kyu-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-18T23:55:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-18T23:55:30Z-
dc.date.created2025-03-05-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.issn2379-1381-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/200169-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). Aim: To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. Methods: From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. Results: Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 +/- 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size <= 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers. Conclusions: GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isPartOfTOMOGRAPHY-
dc.relation.isPartOfTOMOGRAPHY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleComparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Kyu-Chong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jin-Kyem-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Dong-Kyu-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/tomography10070077-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ04624-
dc.identifier.eissn2379-139X-
dc.identifier.pmid39058049-
dc.subject.keywordgallbladder-
dc.subject.keywordpolyps-
dc.subject.keywordultrasonography-
dc.subject.keywordreproducibility of results-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dong Kyu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dong-Kyu-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85199670332-
dc.identifier.wosid001277728500001-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage1031-
dc.citation.endPage1041-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTOMOGRAPHY, Vol.10(7) : 1031-1041, 2024-07-
dc.identifier.rimsid85398-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorgallbladder-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpolyps-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorultrasonography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreproducibility of results-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.