0 273

Cited 0 times in

Cited 3 times in

Three year post heart transplant outcomes of desensitized durable mechanical circulatory support patients

Authors
 Youn, Jong -Chan  ;  Kim, Darae  ;  Jung, Mi-Hyang  ;  Kim, Jin-Jin  ;  Kim, In-Cheol  ;  Lee, Hye Sun  ;  Choi, Jin-Oh  ;  Jeon, Eun-Seok  ;  Nishihara, Keith  ;  Seguchi, Osamu  ;  Kransdorf, Evan P.  ;  Chang, David H.  ;  Kittleson, Michelle M.  ;  Patel, Jignesh K.  ;  Cole, Robert M.  ;  Moriguchi, Jaime D.  ;  Ramzy, Danny  ;  Esmailian, Fardad  ;  Kobashigawa, Jon A. 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, Vol.42(10) : 1408-1414, 2023-10 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN
 1053-2498 
Issue Date
2023-10
Keywords
heart transplantation ; mechanical circulatory ; desensitization therapy ; prognosis ; support ; infection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risks and benefits of desensitization therapy (DST) in highly sensitized mechanical circulatory support (MCS) patients are not well known. We investigated 3 year post-transplant outcomes of desensitized durable MCS patients. METHODS: Among 689 consecutively enrolled heart transplantation recipients between 2010 and 2016, we categorized them into Group A (desensitized MCS patients, n = 21), Group B (desensitized nonMCS patients, n = 28) and Group C (all nondesensitized patients, n = 640). Post-transplant outcomes included the incidence of primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and infectious complications. RESULTS: The types of DST in Groups A and B were similar and included combinations of rituximab/ intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis/bortezomib. Group A, compared with Group B, showed significantly higher pre-DST panel reactive antibody (PRA) (92.2 +/- 9.8 vs. 83.3 +/- 15.6, P = 0.007) and higher PRA reduction after DST (-22.2 +/- 26.9 vs. -6.3 +/- 7.5, P = 0.015). Groups A and C showed comparable primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, and AMR. Although statistically not significant, Group A showed numerically higher 3-year freedom from AMR than Group B. Infectious complications were similar in both Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: DST for MCS patients showed significant PRA reduction, resulting in an expansion of the donor pool. The post-transplant outcome of desensitized MCS patients showed comparable clinical outcomes to non-desensitized control patients in the same study period, revealing the safety and ef-ficacy of DST. (c) 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
DOI
10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.001
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Hye Sun(이혜선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6948
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197454
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links