Cited 13 times in

Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

Authors
 Young Joo Suh  ;  Cherry Kim  ;  June-Goo Lee  ;  Hongmin Oh  ;  Heejun Kang  ;  Young-Hak Kim  ;  Dong Hyun Yang 
Citation
 EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.33(2) : 1254-1265, 2023-02 
Journal Title
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
ISSN
 0938-7994 
Issue Date
2023-02
MeSH
Artificial Intelligence ; Calcium* / analysis ; Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques* / methods ; Coronary Vessels* / diagnostic imaging ; Datasets as Topic ; Electrocardiography ; Humans ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods
Keywords
Artificial intelligence ; Calcium ; Coronary vessels ; Thorax ; Tomography, X-ray computed
Abstract
Objectives: To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard.

Methods: This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics.

Results: CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998-0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987-0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918-0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748-0.924) on LDCT.

Conclusions: The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions.

Key points: • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score-based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
DOI
10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Suh, Young Joo(서영주) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-5832
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193680
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links