Cited 13 times in

Fully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author서영주-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-27T02:43:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-27T02:43:34Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/193680-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based fully automatic coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring system on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) using multi-institutional datasets with manual CAC scoring as the reference standard. Methods: This retrospective study included 452 subjects from three academic institutions, who underwent both ECG-gated calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) and LDCT scans. For all CSCT and LDCT scans, automatic CAC scoring (CAC_auto) was performed using AI-based software, and manual CAC scoring (CAC_man) was set as the reference standard. The reliability and agreement of CAC_auto was evaluated and compared with that of CAC_man using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The reliability between CAC_auto and CAC_man for CAC severity categories was analyzed using weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Results: CAC_auto on CSCT and LDCT yielded a high ICC (0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.998-0.999 and 0.989, 95% CI 0.987-0.991, respectively) and a mean difference with 95% limits of agreement of 1.3 ± 37.1 and 0.8 ± 75.7, respectively. CAC_auto achieved excellent reliability for CAC severity (κ = 0.918-0.972) on CSCT and good to excellent but heterogenous reliability among datasets (κ = 0.748-0.924) on LDCT. Conclusions: The application of an AI-based automatic CAC scoring software to LDCT shows good to excellent reliability in CAC score and CAC severity categorization in multi-institutional datasets; however, the reliability varies among institutions. Key points: • AI-based automatic CAC scoring on LDCT shows excellent reliability with manual CAC scoring in multi-institutional datasets. • The reliability for CAC score-based severity categorization varies among datasets. • Automatic scoring for LDCT shows a higher false-positive rate than automatic scoring for CSCT, and most common causes of a false-positive are image noise and artifacts for both CSCT and LDCT.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHArtificial Intelligence-
dc.subject.MESHCalcium* / analysis-
dc.subject.MESHCardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Vessels* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHDatasets as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHElectrocardiography-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMulticenter Studies as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods-
dc.titleFully automatic coronary calcium scoring in non-ECG-gated low-dose chest CT: comparison with ECG-gated cardiac CT-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joo Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCherry Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJune-Goo Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHongmin Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHeejun Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Hak Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Hyun Yang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3-
dc.contributor.localIdA01892-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid36098798-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-022-09117-3-
dc.subject.keywordArtificial intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordCalcium-
dc.subject.keywordCoronary vessels-
dc.subject.keywordThorax-
dc.subject.keywordTomography, X-ray computed-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSuh, Young Joo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서영주-
dc.citation.volume33-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage1254-
dc.citation.endPage1265-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.33(2) : 1254-1265, 2023-02-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.