151 316

Cited 1 times in

Differing benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level

Authors
 Si Eun Lee  ;  Kyunghwa Han  ;  Ji Hyun Youk  ;  Jee Eun Lee  ;  Ji-Young Hwang  ;  Miribi Rho  ;  Jiyoung Yoon  ;  Eun-Kyung Kim  ;  Jung Hyun Yoon 
Citation
 ULTRASONOGRAPHY, Vol.41(4) : 718-727, 2022-10 
Journal Title
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
ISSN
 2288-5919 
Issue Date
2022-10
Keywords
Breast neoplasms ; Diagnosis, Computer-assisted artificial intelligence ; Ultrasonography
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated how artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AICAD) for breast ultrasonography (US) influences diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists with varying experience levels in different workflows.

Methods: Images of 492 breast lesions (200 malignant and 292 benign masses) in 472 women taken from April 2017 to June 2018 were included. Six radiologists (three inexperienced [<1 year of experience] and three experienced [10-15 years of experience]) individually reviewed US images with and without the aid of AI-CAD, first sequentially and then simultaneously. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were calculated and compared between radiologists and AI-CAD.

Results: After implementing AI-CAD, the specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy significantly improved, regardless of experience and workflow (all P<0.001, respectively). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased in simultaneous reading, but only for inexperienced radiologists. The agreement for Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) descriptors generally increased when AI-CAD was used (κ=0.29-0.63 to 0.35-0.73). Inexperienced radiologists tended to concede to AI-CAD results more easily than experienced radiologists, especially in simultaneous reading (P<0.001). The conversion rates for final assessment changes from BI-RADS 2 or 3 to BI-RADS higher than 4a or vice versa were also significantly higher in simultaneous reading than sequential reading (overall, 15.8% and 6.2%, respectively; P<0.001) for both inexperienced and experienced radiologists.

Conclusion: Using AI-CAD to interpret breast US improved the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of radiologists regardless of experience level. AI-CAD may work better in simultaneous reading to improve diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists, especially for inexperienced radiologists.
Files in This Item:
T202204707.pdf Download
DOI
10.14366/usg.22014
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Research Institute (부설연구소) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Eun-Kyung(김은경) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-5013
Rho, Miribi(노미리비) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-7657
Youk, Ji Hyun(육지현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-780X
Yoon, Jung Hyun(윤정현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-3513
Yoon, Jiyoung(윤지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-0803
Lee, Si Eun(이시은) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3225-5484
Han, Kyung Hwa(한경화)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192147
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links