158 334

Cited 1 times in

Differing benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author육지현-
dc.contributor.author윤정현-
dc.contributor.author한경화-
dc.contributor.author이시은-
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.contributor.author노미리비-
dc.contributor.author윤지영-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T04:29:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T04:29:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.issn2288-5919-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192147-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated how artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AICAD) for breast ultrasonography (US) influences diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists with varying experience levels in different workflows. Methods: Images of 492 breast lesions (200 malignant and 292 benign masses) in 472 women taken from April 2017 to June 2018 were included. Six radiologists (three inexperienced [<1 year of experience] and three experienced [10-15 years of experience]) individually reviewed US images with and without the aid of AI-CAD, first sequentially and then simultaneously. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were calculated and compared between radiologists and AI-CAD. Results: After implementing AI-CAD, the specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy significantly improved, regardless of experience and workflow (all P<0.001, respectively). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased in simultaneous reading, but only for inexperienced radiologists. The agreement for Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) descriptors generally increased when AI-CAD was used (κ=0.29-0.63 to 0.35-0.73). Inexperienced radiologists tended to concede to AI-CAD results more easily than experienced radiologists, especially in simultaneous reading (P<0.001). The conversion rates for final assessment changes from BI-RADS 2 or 3 to BI-RADS higher than 4a or vice versa were also significantly higher in simultaneous reading than sequential reading (overall, 15.8% and 6.2%, respectively; P<0.001) for both inexperienced and experienced radiologists. Conclusion: Using AI-CAD to interpret breast US improved the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of radiologists regardless of experience level. AI-CAD may work better in simultaneous reading to improve diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists, especially for inexperienced radiologists.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine-
dc.relation.isPartOfULTRASONOGRAPHY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleDiffering benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi Eun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyunghwa Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hyun Youk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Eun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Young Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMiribi Rho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJiyoung Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hyun Yoon-
dc.identifier.doi10.14366/usg.22014-
dc.contributor.localIdA02537-
dc.contributor.localIdA02595-
dc.contributor.localIdA04267-
dc.contributor.localIdA05611-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.contributor.localIdA05327-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02768-
dc.identifier.eissn2288-5943-
dc.identifier.pmid35850498-
dc.subject.keywordBreast neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordDiagnosis, Computer-assisted artificial intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordUltrasonography-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYouk, Ji Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor육지현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤정현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한경화-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이시은-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김은경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor노미리비-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage718-
dc.citation.endPage727-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationULTRASONOGRAPHY, Vol.41(4) : 718-727, 2022-10-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Research Institute (부설연구소) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.