66 239

Cited 4 times in

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (Peep) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation

Authors
 In-Jung Jun  ;  Mi Hwa Chung  ;  Jung Eun Kim  ;  Hye Sun Lee  ;  Jung Mo Son  ;  Eun Mi Choi 
Citation
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, Vol.18(12) : 2589-2598, 2021-04 
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Issue Date
2021-04
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Pressure ; Female ; Fluid Therapy / methods* ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care / methods ; Intraoperative Complications / diagnosis* ; Intraoperative Complications / etiology ; Intraoperative Complications / prevention & control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; One-Lung Ventilation / adverse effects* ; One-Lung Ventilation / methods ; Positive-Pressure Respiration* ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary Surgical Procedures / adverse effects* ; Pulmonary Surgical Procedures / methods ; ROC Curve ; Stroke Volume ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Keywords
Esophageal Doppler ; fluid responsiveness ; one-lung ventilation ; positive end-expiratory pressure ; pulse pressure variation ; stroke volume variation
Abstract
Background: Dynamic preload parameters such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have widely been used as accurate predictors for fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. To circumvent the limitation of decreased cyclic change of intrathoracic pressure, we performed an intermittent PEEP challenge test to evaluate whether PPV or SVV can predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods: Forty patients undergoing OLV were analyzed. Baseline hemodynamic variables including PPV and SVV and respiratory variables were recorded after chest opening in lateral position under OLV (T1). Five minutes after application of PEEP 10 cmH2O, the parameters were recorded (T2). Thereafter, PEEP was withdrawn to 0 cmH2O for 5 minutes (T3), and fluid loading was performed with balanced crystalloid solution 6 mL/kg of ideal body weight for 5 minutes. Five minutes after completion of fluid loading, all variables were recorded (T4). The patient was classified as fluid responder if SV increased ≥10% after fluid loading and as non-responder if SV increased <10%. Results: Prediction of fluid responsiveness was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Change in stroke volume variation (ΔSVV) showed AUC of 0.9 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 82% for discrimination of fluid responsiveness. Change in pulse pressure variation (ΔPPV) showed AUC of 0.88 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.78-0.97, sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 72% in predictability of fluid responsiveness. Cardiac index and stroke volume were well maintained after PEEP challenge in non-responders while they increased in responders. Conclusions: ΔPPV and ΔSVV induced by PEEP challenge are reliable parameters to predict fluid responsiveness as well as very good predictors of fluid unresponsiveness during OLV.
Files in This Item:
T202125849.pdf Download
DOI
10.7150/ijms.59653
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Hye Sun(이혜선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6948
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/188219
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links