121 452

Cited 4 times in

Cited 4 times in

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJun, In-Jung-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Mi Hwa-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung Eun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.authorSon, Jung Mo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Eun Mi-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T16:49:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-09T16:49:26Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-25-
dc.date.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.issn1449-1907-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/188219-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dynamic preload parameters such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have widely been used as accurate predictors for fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. To circumvent the limitation of decreased cyclic change of intrathoracic pressure, we performed an intermittent PEEP challenge test to evaluate whether PPV or SVV can predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods: Forty patients undergoing OLV were analyzed. Baseline hemodynamic variables including PPV and SVV and respiratory variables were recorded after chest opening in lateral position under OLV (T1). Five minutes after application of PEEP 10 cmH2O, the parameters were recorded (T2). Thereafter, PEEP was withdrawn to 0 cmH2O for 5 minutes (T3), and fluid loading was performed with balanced crystalloid solution 6 mL/kg of ideal body weight for 5 minutes. Five minutes after completion of fluid loading, all variables were recorded (T4). The patient was classified as fluid responder if SV increased >= 10% after fluid loading and as non-responder if SV increased <10%. Results: Prediction of fluid responsiveness was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Change in stroke volume variation (delta SVV) showed AUC of 0.9 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 82% for discrimination of fluid responsiveness. Change in pulse pressure variation (delta PPV) showed AUC of 0.88 (P < 0.001), 95% CI = 0.78-0.97, sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 72% in predictability of fluid responsiveness. Cardiac index and stroke volume were well maintained after PEEP challenge in non-responders while they increased in responders. Conclusions: delta PPV and delta SVV induced by PEEP challenge are reliable parameters to predict fluid responsiveness as well as very good predictors of fluid unresponsiveness during OLV.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIvyspring International Publisher-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleThe influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentYonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun, In-Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Mi Hwa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jung Eun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSon, Jung Mo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Eun Mi-
dc.identifier.doi10.7150/ijms.59653-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02917-
dc.identifier.eissn1449-1907-
dc.subject.keywordpositive end-expiratory pressure-
dc.subject.keywordone-lung ventilation-
dc.subject.keywordpulse pressure variation-
dc.subject.keywordstroke volume variation-
dc.subject.keywordfluid responsiveness-
dc.subject.keywordEsophageal Doppler-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Hye Sun-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85106170890-
dc.identifier.wosid000648637600013-
dc.citation.volume18-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage2589-
dc.citation.endPage2598-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, Vol.18(12) : 2589-2598, 2021-04-
dc.identifier.rimsid71382-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpositive end-expiratory pressure-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorone-lung ventilation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpulse pressure variation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstroke volume variation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfluid responsiveness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEsophageal Doppler-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTROKE VOLUME VARIATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTIDAL VOLUME-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOPPLER-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedicine, General & Internal-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGeneral & Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.