0 395

Cited 9 times in

Comparison of diagnostic performance of the ACR and Kwak TIRADS applying the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author곽진영-
dc.contributor.author박영진-
dc.contributor.author윤정현-
dc.contributor.author이혜선-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T01:42:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-29T01:42:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/184511-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the diagnostic performances and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rates of two point-scale based TIRADS and compare them with a modified version using the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds. Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. A total of 2106 thyroid nodules 10 mm or larger in size in 2084 patients with definitive cytopathologic findings were included. Ultrasonography categories were assigned according to each guideline. We applied the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA to the Kwak TIRADS and defined it as the modified Kwak TIRADS (mKwak TIRADS). Diagnostic performances and unnecessary FNA rates were evaluated for both the original and modified guidelines. Results: Of the original guidelines, the ACR TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (63.1%, 68.9%, and 0.748, respectively). When the size threshold of the ACR TIRADS was applied to the Kwak TIRADS, the resultant mKwak TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and AUC (64.7%, 70.3%, and 0.765, respectively) than the ACR TIRADS. The mKwak TIRADS also had a lower unnecessary FNA rate than the ACR TIRADS (54.8% and 56.4%, respectively). The false-negative rate of the Kwak TIRADS was the lowest (1.9%) among all TIRADS. Conclusion: The modified Kwak TIRADS incorporating the size thresholds of the ACR TIRADS showed higher diagnostic performance and a lower unnecessary FNA rate than the original point-scale based TIRADS. Key points: • Of the original guidelines, the ACR TIRADS had the highest specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (63.1%, 68.9%, and 0.748, respectively). • When the size threshold of the ACR TIRADS was applied to the Kwak TIRADS, the resultant modified version of Kwak TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and AUC (64.7%, 70.3%, and 0.765, respectively) than the ACR TIRADS. • The false-negative rate of the Kwak TIRADS was the lowest (1.9%) among all TIRADS.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHBiopsy, Fine-Needle-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHROC Curve-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHThyroid Neoplasms*-
dc.subject.MESHThyroid Nodule*-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography-
dc.titleComparison of diagnostic performance of the ACR and Kwak TIRADS applying the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun Huh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hyun Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Sun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVivian Youngjean Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Young Kwak-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-020-07591-1-
dc.contributor.localIdA00182-
dc.contributor.localIdA01572-
dc.contributor.localIdA02595-
dc.contributor.localIdA03312-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid33449191-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-020-07591-1-
dc.subject.keywordBiopsy, fine-needle-
dc.subject.keywordThyroid gland-
dc.subject.keywordThyroid neoplasm-
dc.subject.keywordThyroid nodule-
dc.subject.keywordUltrasonography-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKwak, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor곽진영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박영진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤정현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이혜선-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage5243-
dc.citation.endPage5250-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.31(7) : 5243-5250, 2021-07-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.