0 625

Cited 87 times in

Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018

Authors
 Yeun-Yoon Kim  ;  Myeong-Jin Kim  ;  Eun Hwa Kim  ;  Yun Ho Roh  ;  Chansik An 
Citation
 RADIOLOGY, Vol.291(1) : 72-80, 2019 
Journal Title
RADIOLOGY
ISSN
 0033-8419 
Issue Date
2019
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)version2018for differentiating betweenhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC) andother(hepatic)malignancy(OM) in patients with livercirrhosis. Materials and Methods From 2008 to 2017, 55 patients with untreated OM and livercirrhosiswere eligible for this retrospective case-control study (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [standard deviation] [range, 32-79 years], with 45 men [mean age, 58 years ± 11] and 10 women [mean age, 62 years ± 7]). Control subjects consisted of 165 treatment-naive patients with HCC and livercirrhosis(mean age, 58 years ± 10 [range, 29-80 years], with 134 men [mean age, 58 years ± 9] and 31 women [mean age, 59 years ± 11]). Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently determined the presence of LR-M features and major HCC features (non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, and enhancing capsule). The diagnostic performances of each feature, the LR-M criteria (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC), and the LR-5 criteria (definitely HCC) were calculated and compared by using the generalized estimating equation method. Results Individual LR-M features had a sensitivity of 9%-71% and a specificity of 83%-97% for the diagnosis of OM. Major features of HCC had a sensitivity of 62%-83% and a specificity of 69%-89% for the diagnosis of HCC. The LR-M criteria had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 97%) for diagnosing OM, with a specificity of 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%). The LR-5 criteria had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) for diagnosing HCC, with a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 97%). The accuracy of the LR-5 criteria was higher than that of the LR-M criteria (78% [95% CI: 72%, 83%] vs 58% [95% CI: 52%, 65%], P <. 001). Conclusion The LR-5 criteria as well as the LR-M criteria can effectively distinguishhepatocellularcarcinomafromotherhepaticmalignancyin patients with livercirrhosis. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Furlan in this issue.
Full Text
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2019181995
DOI
10.1148/radiol.2019181995
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Myeong Jin(김명진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-5402
Kim, Yeun-Yoon(김연윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-5332
An, Chansik(안찬식) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-6658
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/170305
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links