0 595

Cited 81 times in

Hepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author김연윤-
dc.contributor.author안찬식-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T06:47:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-23T06:47:01Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/170305-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)version2018for differentiating betweenhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC) andother(hepatic)malignancy(OM) in patients with livercirrhosis. Materials and Methods From 2008 to 2017, 55 patients with untreated OM and livercirrhosiswere eligible for this retrospective case-control study (mean age, 58 years ± 10 [standard deviation] [range, 32-79 years], with 45 men [mean age, 58 years ± 11] and 10 women [mean age, 62 years ± 7]). Control subjects consisted of 165 treatment-naive patients with HCC and livercirrhosis(mean age, 58 years ± 10 [range, 29-80 years], with 134 men [mean age, 58 years ± 9] and 31 women [mean age, 59 years ± 11]). Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis independently determined the presence of LR-M features and major HCC features (non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, and enhancing capsule). The diagnostic performances of each feature, the LR-M criteria (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC), and the LR-5 criteria (definitely HCC) were calculated and compared by using the generalized estimating equation method. Results Individual LR-M features had a sensitivity of 9%-71% and a specificity of 83%-97% for the diagnosis of OM. Major features of HCC had a sensitivity of 62%-83% and a specificity of 69%-89% for the diagnosis of HCC. The LR-M criteria had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81%, 97%) for diagnosing OM, with a specificity of 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%). The LR-5 criteria had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) for diagnosing HCC, with a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 97%). The accuracy of the LR-5 criteria was higher than that of the LR-M criteria (78% [95% CI: 72%, 83%] vs 58% [95% CI: 52%, 65%], P <. 001). Conclusion The LR-5 criteria as well as the LR-M criteria can effectively distinguishhepatocellularcarcinomafromotherhepaticmalignancyin patients with livercirrhosis. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Furlan in this issue.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleHepatocellular Carcinoma versus Other Hepatic Malignancy in Cirrhosis: Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeun-Yoon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Hwa Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYun Ho Roh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChansik An-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2019181995-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA04902-
dc.contributor.localIdA02268-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02596-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-1315-
dc.identifier.pmid30694166-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2019181995-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김연윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안찬식-
dc.citation.volume291-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage72-
dc.citation.endPage80-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRADIOLOGY, Vol.291(1) : 72-80, 2019-
dc.identifier.rimsid62311-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.