2 594

Cited 22 times in

Gluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis

Authors
 Young-Woo Cheon  ;  Myung Chul Lee  ;  Young Seok Kim  ;  Dong Kyun Rah  ;  Won Jai Lee 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, Vol.63(4) : 642-647, 2010 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY
ISSN
 1748-6815 
Issue Date
2010
MeSH
Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbosacral Region/radiation effects ; Lumbosacral Region/surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoradionecrosis/complications ; Osteoradionecrosis/surgery* ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Flaps/blood supply* ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulcer/etiology ; Ulcer/surgery* ; Wound Healing
Keywords
Gluteal artery perforator ; Perforator flaps ; Radiation ulcer ; Osteoradionecrosis ; Sacrum
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a crucial part in the treatment of cancer; however, it may cause adverse effects to normal tissue such as radiation-induced ulcer and osteoradionecrosis. The few cases of conservative management that were reported had a limited value and unsatisfactory results. The most reliable method to treat sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis is a wide excision of the affected tissue, followed by coverage with well-vascularised tissue. Musculocutaneous free flaps and local gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flaps have been used; however, there were many drawbacks such as dissection of recipient vessel in the previously radiated area and donor-site morbidity. During a 4-year time period at our institute, we found favourable clinical results using gluteal artery perforator procedure for radiation-induced ulcers and osteoradionecrosis of the sacral area. The 10 patients, who were treated with gluteal artery perforator flaps, had chronic non-healing radiation ulcers or bone exposure of the sacrum. Intra-operatively, massive debridement of bone and soft tissue was performed, while the well-vascularised skin with only a colour change was preserved. The flap was designed to include two or more perforators using Doppler flowmetry and the perforators were preserved with surrounding subcutaneous tissue during the flap elevation. The mean post-operative follow-up period was 25.7 months. As regards the surgery, there was one major complication (of partial flap loss) and three minor complications (of wound dehiscence). In the patient with partial flap loss due to infection and a floating flap, the contralateral superior gluteal artery perforator flap was used to treat complications. Other complications were conservatively treated and well healed. Gluteal perforator flaps are a valuable alternative in treating sacral radiation ulcers and osteoradionecrosis. Sufficient excision of devitalised tissue is a crucial procedure to achieve optimal results
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681509001909
DOI
10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.081
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (성형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Young Seok(김영석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-2107
Rah, Dong Kyun(나동균)
Lee, Won Jai(이원재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-0503
Cheon, Young Woo(전영우)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/100838
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links