2 598

Cited 22 times in

Gluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김영석-
dc.contributor.author나동균-
dc.contributor.author이원재-
dc.contributor.author전영우-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T16:34:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-23T16:34:42Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/100838-
dc.description.abstractRadiotherapy is a crucial part in the treatment of cancer; however, it may cause adverse effects to normal tissue such as radiation-induced ulcer and osteoradionecrosis. The few cases of conservative management that were reported had a limited value and unsatisfactory results. The most reliable method to treat sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis is a wide excision of the affected tissue, followed by coverage with well-vascularised tissue. Musculocutaneous free flaps and local gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flaps have been used; however, there were many drawbacks such as dissection of recipient vessel in the previously radiated area and donor-site morbidity. During a 4-year time period at our institute, we found favourable clinical results using gluteal artery perforator procedure for radiation-induced ulcers and osteoradionecrosis of the sacral area. The 10 patients, who were treated with gluteal artery perforator flaps, had chronic non-healing radiation ulcers or bone exposure of the sacrum. Intra-operatively, massive debridement of bone and soft tissue was performed, while the well-vascularised skin with only a colour change was preserved. The flap was designed to include two or more perforators using Doppler flowmetry and the perforators were preserved with surrounding subcutaneous tissue during the flap elevation. The mean post-operative follow-up period was 25.7 months. As regards the surgery, there was one major complication (of partial flap loss) and three minor complications (of wound dehiscence). In the patient with partial flap loss due to infection and a floating flap, the contralateral superior gluteal artery perforator flap was used to treat complications. Other complications were conservatively treated and well healed. Gluteal perforator flaps are a valuable alternative in treating sacral radiation ulcers and osteoradionecrosis. Sufficient excision of devitalised tissue is a crucial procedure to achieve optimal results-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent642~647-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLumbosacral Region/radiation effects-
dc.subject.MESHLumbosacral Region/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHOsteoradionecrosis/complications-
dc.subject.MESHOsteoradionecrosis/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHReconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSurgical Flaps/blood supply*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHUlcer/etiology-
dc.subject.MESHUlcer/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHWound Healing-
dc.titleGluteal artery perforator flap: a viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Plastic Surgery & Reconstructive Surgery (성형외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Woo Cheon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyung Chul Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Seok Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Kyun Rah-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Jai Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.081-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00709-
dc.contributor.localIdA01229-
dc.contributor.localIdA03005-
dc.contributor.localIdA03531-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01714-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-0539-
dc.identifier.pmid19345625-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681509001909-
dc.subject.keywordGluteal artery perforator-
dc.subject.keywordPerforator flaps-
dc.subject.keywordRadiation ulcer-
dc.subject.keywordOsteoradionecrosis-
dc.subject.keywordSacrum-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Seok-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRah, Dong Kyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Won Jai-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCheon, Young Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young Seok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRah, Dong Kyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Won Jai-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCheon, Young Woo-
dc.citation.volume63-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage642-
dc.citation.endPage647-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, Vol.63(4) : 642-647, 2010-
dc.identifier.rimsid55253-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (성형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.