Body size indexes for optimizing iodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: comparison of total body weight, lean body weight, and blood volume

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare total body weight (TBW), lean body weight (LBW), and estimated blood volume (BV) for the adjustment of the iodine dose required for contrast material-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) of the aorta and liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. One hundred twenty patients (54 men, 66 women; mean age, 64.1 years; range, 19-88 years) who underwent multidetector CT of the upper abdomen were randomized into three groups of 40 patients each: (a) TBW group (0.6 g of iodine per kilogram of TBW), (b) LBW group (0.821 g of iodine per kilogram of LBW), and (c) BV group (men, 8.6 g of iodine per liter of BV; women, 9.9 g of iodine per liter of BV). Change in CT number between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images per gram of iodine and maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) adjusted for iodine dose were examined for correlation with TBW, LBW, and BV by using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS: In the portal venous phase, correlation coefficients for the correlation of change in CT number per gram of iodine with TBW for the aorta and liver were -0.71 and -0.79, respectively, in the TBW group; -0.80 and -0.86, respectively, in the LBW group; and -0.68 and -0.66, respectively, in the BV group. In the liver, they were marginally higher in the LBW group than in the BV group (P = .03). Adjusted MHE remained constant at 77.9 HU +/- 10.2 (standard deviation) in the LBW group with respect to TBW, but it increased in the TBW (r = 0.80, P < .001) and BV (r = 0.70, P < .001) groups as TBW increased.

CONCLUSION: When LBW, rather than TBW or BV, is used, the iodine dose required to achieve consistent hepatic enhancement may be estimated more precisely and with reduced patient-to-patient variability