2 255

Cited 17 times in

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

Authors
 In Gyu Kwon  ;  In Cho  ;  Ali Guner  ;  Yoon Young Choi  ;  Hyun Beak Shin  ;  Hyoung-Il Kim  ;  Ji Yeong An  ;  Jae-Ho Cheong  ;  Sung Hoon Noh  ;  Woo Jin Hyung 
Citation
 Surgical Endoscopy , Vol.28(8) : 2452-2458, 2014 
Journal Title
 Surgical Endoscopy  
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2014
MeSH
Adenocarcinoma/mortality ; Adenocarcinoma/pathology ; Adenocarcinoma/surgery ; Analgesics/therapeutic use ; Female ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Gastric Stump/surgery* ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Laparoscopy* ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures* ; Spleen/injuries ; Spleen/surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms/mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*
Keywords
Minimally invasive surgery ; Remnant gastric cancer ; Stomach ; Completion total gastrectomy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203 min, P = 0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-014-3496-8
DOI
10.1007/s00464-014-3496-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, In Gyu(권인규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-467X
Kim, Hyoung Il(김형일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Noh, Sung Hoon(노성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-6886
Shin, Hyun Beak(신현백)
Cheong, Jae Ho(정재호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-1781
Cho, In(조인)
Choi, Yoon Young(최윤영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-7851
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/99394
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse