183 187

Cited 18 times in

Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement

 Su Yeon Ko  ;  Eun-Kyung Kim  ;  Min Jung Kim  ;  Hee Jung Moon 
 KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol.15(3) : 313-321, 2014 
Journal Title
Issue Date
Adult ; Aged ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms/classification ; Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Mammary Glands, Human/abnormalities* ; Mammary Glands, Human/surgery ; Mammography* ; Mastectomy/methods ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Radiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult
American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ; Mammographic breast density ; Volumetric breast density measurement
OBJECTIVE: To compare automated volumetric breast density measurement (VBDM) with radiologists' evaluations based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), and to identify the factors associated with technical failure of VBDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 1129 women aged 19-82 years who underwent mammography from December 2011 to January 2012 were included. Breast density evaluations by radiologists based on BI-RADS and by VBDM (Volpara Version 1.5.1) were compared. The agreement in interpreting breast density between radiologists and VBDM was determined based on four density grades (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and a binary classification of fatty (D1-2) vs. dense (D3-4) breast using kappa statistics. The association between technical failure of VBDM and patient age, total breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, history of partial mastectomy, the frequency of mass > 3 cm, and breast density was analyzed. RESULTS: The agreement between breast density evaluations by radiologists and VBDM was fair (k value = 0.26) when the four density grades (D1/D2/D3/D4) were used and moderate (k value = 0.47) for the binary classification (D1-2/D3-4). Twenty-seven women (2.4%) showed failure of VBDM. Small total breast volume, history of partial mastectomy, and high breast density were significantly associated with technical failure of VBDM (p = 0.001 to 0.015). CONCLUSION: There is fair or moderate agreement in breast density evaluation between radiologists and VBDM. Technical failure of VBDM may be related to small total breast volume, a history of partial mastectomy, and high breast density.
Files in This Item:
T201401374.pdf Download
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Min Jung(김민정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-1237
Kim, Eun-Kyung(김은경) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-5013
Moon, Hee Jung(문희정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5643-5885
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.