4 241

Cited 11 times in

Comparison between Tonopachy and Other Tonometric and Pachymetric Devices

 Lee, Yong Gi  ;  Kim, Ji Hyun  ;  Kim, Na Rae  ;  Kim, Chan Yun  ;  Lee, Eun Suk 
 OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, Vol.88(7) : 843-849, 2011 
Journal Title
Issue Date
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cornea/diagnostic imaging* ; Female ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular/instrumentation* ; Tonometry, Ocular/standards ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult
central corneal thickness ; intraocular pressure ; Tonopachy ; Pentacam ; Goldmann applanation tonometer ; ultrasound pachymetry
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement by Tonopachy to that by Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry, and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement to that by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The reproducibility of CCT and IOP measurements by Tonopachy was also evaluated. METHODS: In 104 eyes of 104 patients, CCT was measured by Tonopachy, Pentacam, and ultrasound pachymetry, and IOP was measured by Tonopachy and GAT. Each CCT and IOP measurement was compared using Pearson correlation, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bland-Altman plots. In 30 subjects, CCT and IOP measurements by Tonopachy were repeated to evaluate intrasession and intraobserver variability. RESULTS: Both CCT and IOP measurements were highly correlated among all instruments used in this study. CCT measurements by three pachymeters were statistically different (p<0.0001). CCT measured by ultrasound pachymetry was lowest (541.7 ± 30.6 μm) whereas those by Tonopachy and Pentacam showed no difference (557.3 ± 34.3 and 558.0 ± 33.7 μm, respectively). Tonopachy overestimated CCT by 13.9 μm when compared with ultrasound pachymetry. There was a statistically significant difference between IOP measurements by two tonometers (p<0.0001); IOP measurement was higher by Tonopachy than by GAT (13.9 ± 4.2 and 12.5 ± 3.2 mm Hg, respectively). Tonopachy overestimated IOP measurements by 1.2 mm Hg compared with GAT. Intersession agreements for IOP and CCT measurements by Tonopachy were excellent (intraclass correlation, 0.902 and 0.962, respectively) with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -1.4 to 2.2 mm Hg and from -12.9 to 12.1 μm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although CCT and IOP measurements obtained by Tonopachy were reproducible and showed close agreement with ultrasound pachymetry and Pentacam, and GAT, careful attention should be paid when comparing Tonopachy CCT measurement to ultrasound pachymetry or its IOP measurement to GAT as the values may not be interchangeable. Tonopachy is a reliable instrument for evaluating CCT and IOP.
Full Text
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Na Rae(김나래)
Kim, Ji Hyun(김지현)
Kim, Chan Yun(김찬윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8373-9999
Lee, Young Ji(이영지)
Lee, Eun Suk(이은석)
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.