Cited 21 times in

Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.

Authors
 Yeon Ju Gwak  ;  Hye Jung Kim  ;  Jin Young Kwak  ;  Sang Kwon Lee  ;  Kyung Min Shin  ;  Hui Joong Lee  ;  Gab Chul Kim  ;  Yun-Jin Jang  ;  Man Hoon Han  ;  Ji Young Park  ;  Jin Hyang Jung 
Citation
 ACTA RADIOLOGICA, Vol.52(4) : 364-371, 2011 
Journal Title
ACTA RADIOLOGICA
ISSN
 0284-1851 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology* ; Calcinosis ; Carcinoma in Situ/diagnostic imaging* ; Carcinoma in Situ/pathology* ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging* ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology* ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Mammary
Keywords
Breast ; ultrasound ; screening ; neoplasms ; calcifications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is asymptomatic and usually manifests as calcifications in screening mammography. On the other hand, little is known about ultrasonographic (US) features of asymptomatic DCIS, for US is rarely used for the diagnosis and evaluation of DCIS because of low sensitivity in detecting microcalcifications.

PURPOSE: To evaluate US detection and characterization of DCIS in asymptomatic women and correlate these imaging findings with the histopathologic features.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated mammographic and US images of 60 DCIS cases from 59 asymptomatic women. US was performed in knowledge of mammographic findings. The following histopathologic parameters were analyzed: Van Nuys classification, architectural pattern, and presence of microinvasion. Image detectability and US features were correlated with these histopathologic parameters.

RESULTS: Of the 54 cases (90.0%) detected on mammography, 48 cases (88.9%) had microcalcifications only, 5 (9.3%) had microcalcifications with associated density, and 1 (1.9%) had soft tissue density alone. Of the 38 cases (63.3%) identified by US, 29 cases (76.3%) had a mass with or without microcalcifications, six (15.8%) had microcalcifications only, and three (7.9%) had other findings. US identified lesions were associated with higher Van Nuys groups, microinvasion and comedocarcinoma (P = 0.044, P = 0.024, and P = 0.032, respectively). The most common US finding was a not-circumscribed, oval mass with parallel orientation and normal acoustic transmission. Microcalcifications were seen on US in 31 (81.6%) of the 38 US visible cases; this finding showed a trend of association with Van Nuys group 2 and 3 but was not statistically significant (P = 0.063).

CONCLUSION: When DCIS was identified on US, it was associated with more aggressive histopathologic type. However, mammographic correlation is essential to differentiate benign from malignant lesion in cases seen by US; US findings of asymptomatic DCIS had a low suspicion of malignancy.
Full Text
http://acr.sagepub.com/content/52/4/364.long
DOI
10.1258/ar.2011.100391
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwak, Jin Young(곽진영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-1495
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/94707
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links