1 464

Cited 0 times in

Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with diffusion-weighted versus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pretransplant patients.

Authors
 Mi-Suk Park  ;  Sooah Kim  ;  Jignesh Patel  ;  Cristina H. Hajdu  ;  Richard K. G. Do  ;  Lorenzo Mannelli  ;  James S. Babb  ;  Bachir Taouli 
Citation
 HEPATOLOGY, Vol.56(1) : 140-148, 2012 
Journal Title
HEPATOLOGY
ISSN
 0270-9139 
Issue Date
2012
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy, Needle ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis* ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Contrast Media ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA* ; Humans ; Image Enhancement/methods ; Immunohistochemistry ; Liver/pathology* ; Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Preoperative Care/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity
Keywords
Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy, Needle ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis* ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Contrast Media ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA* ; Humans ; Image Enhancement/methods ; Immunohistochemistry ; Liver/pathology* ; Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Preoperative Care/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in pre-liver transplantation patients, compared and combined with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CET1WI), using liver explant as the standard of reference. We included 52 patients with cirrhosis (40 men, 12 women; mean age, 56 years) who underwent DWI and CET1WI within 90 days of liver transplantation. Magnetic resonance images were analyzed for HCC detection in three separate sessions by two independent observers: DWI images (DW-set), CET1WI (CE-set), and all images together (All-set). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), per-patient accuracy, and per-lesion PPV were calculated for each image set. A total of 72 HCCs were present in 33 patients at explant (mean size, 1.5 cm [range, 0.3-6.2 cm]). Per-patient sensitivity and NPV of CE-set were significantly higher than those of DW-set when using pooled data between observers (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively), whereas specificity, PPV, and accuracy were equivalent. Per-lesion sensitivity was significantly higher for CE-set versus DW-set (59.0% versus 43.8%; P = 0.008, pooled data from two observers). When stratified by lesion size, the difference was significant only for lesions with a size between 1 and 2 cm (42.0% for DW-set versus 74.0% for CE-set; P = 0.001). The addition of DWI to CET1WI improved sensitivity for the more experienced observer.

CONCLUSION: DWI is outperformed by CET1WI for detection of HCC, but represents a reasonable alternative to CET1WI for detection of HCC with a size above 2 cm. The addition of DWI to CET1WI slightly increases the detection rate.
Full Text
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.25681/abstract
DOI
22370974
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Mi-Suk(박미숙) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-2444
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/90363
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links