Cited 0 times in

75 4

Intertunnel Relationships in Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction : An In Vivo 3-Dimensional Anatomic Study

Authors
 Sung-Jae Kim ; Chong Bum Chang ; Kwan Kyu Park ; Jae Han Ko ; Sung-Hwan Kim ; Yon-Sik Yoo ; Chong Hyuk Choi 
Citation
 American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol.41(4) : 849~857, 2013 
Journal Title
 American Journal of Sports Medicine 
ISSN
 0363-5465 
Issue Date
2013
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries are relatively common, and tunnel convergence could occur in combined ACL and PLC reconstruction. PURPOSE: This study sought to elucidate the ranges of angles and distances of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteus tendon (PT) femoral tunnels that do not violate the intercondylar notch distally and ACL tunnels proximally during combined ACL and PLC reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Three-dimensional anatomic knee models were developed using customized software from computed tomography images of 14 patients at 0°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. Single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL tunnels using the transtibial method for anteromedial bundles and the anteromedial portal method for posterolateral bundles were created. The ranges of safe angles and distances were measured at 10° and 20° posterior, neutral (0°), and 10° and 20° anterior on the horizontal plane relative to the transepicondylar axis from the isometric LCL and PT femoral insertions. The SB ACL reconstruction using the accessory medial portal and LCL reconstruction using the anatomic footprint were also analyzed. RESULTS: Distal and proximal angles from insertions of the LCL and PT, not violating the intercondylar notch or the ACL tunnels, increased as the LCL or PT headed from a posterior to anterior direction. Safe distances from the LCL and PT femoral insertions were approximately over 35 mm distally and 30 mm proximally. For SB ACL reconstruction using the accessory medial portal, safe angles were larger proximally than those of SB ACL reconstruction using the transtibial technique. For LCL reconstruction using the anatomic footprint, proximal angles were significantly smaller than those of the isometric LCL. CONCLUSION: Considering the relationship between the LCL and PT tunnels and fixation strength, tunneling will be safe when the LCL and PT are positioned at an angle of approximately 20° anterior and 10° proximal to the transepicondylar axis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results will help to reduce the incidence of tunnel convergence in combined ACL and PLC reconstructions.
URI
http://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87026
DOI
10.1177/0363546513478571
Appears in Collections:
1. 연구논문 > 1. College of Medicine > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery
Yonsei Authors
사서에게 알리기
  feedback
Link
 http://ajs.sagepub.com/content/41/4/849.long
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse