0 0

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Impact of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Position on Subclinical Right Ventricular Perforation

Authors
 Lee, Young Shin  ;  Uhm, Jae-Sun  ;  Park, Je-Wook  ;  Park, Seung-Jung  ;  Kim, Ye Chan  ;  Kim, In-Soo  ;  Lee, Hye-Jeong  ;  Kim, Moon-Hyun  ;  Park, Hanjin  ;  Kim, Daehoon  ;  Yu, Hee Tae  ;  Kim, Tae-Hoon  ;  Kim, Jin-Bae  ;  Kim, Jong-Youn  ;  Joung, Boyoung  ;  Pak, Hui-Nam  ;  Lee, Moon-Hyoung 
Citation
 PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2026-03 
Journal Title
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN
 0147-8389 
Issue Date
2026-03
Keywords
artificial ; pacemaker ; pericardial effusion ; tomography ; X-ray computed
Abstract
Introduction Leadless pacemakers are typically implanted in the mid-septum of the right ventricle (RV) to mitigate the risk of perforation. However, reports on the precise location of these implants are limited. This study aimed to elucidate tine-based leadless pacemaker position and presence of subclinical RV perforation through computed tomography (CT) imaging, along with the associated prognosis.Methods Patients who underwent heart, chest or abdomen CT after leadless pacemaker implantation were consecutively included. Two cardiologists and one radiologist reviewed the CT images to assess the position of tines and to detect RV perforation. The implantation position was categorized as the septum, RV free wall, junction of septum and RV free wall, moderator band, and RV apex. Subclinical perforation was defined as the tines of a leadless pacemaker beyond the outer myocardial contour without symptoms, pericardial effusion, hemodynamic instability, or pacemaker malfunction.Results A total of 88 patients (age, 72.9 +/- 12.1 years; 42 males) were included. The interval between procedure and CT scanning was 8.6 +/- 9.2 months. In 68 patients (77.3%), the leadless pacemaker was implanted at the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation occurred in 15 patients (17.0%). Among patients with RV perforation, the most common implantation site was the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. None of the patients with RV perforation experienced any adverse events for 12.4 +/- 12.3 months.Conclusions The most common leadless pacemaker implantation site is the junction of the septum and the RV free wall. Subclinical RV perforation is not uncommon and not associated with overt adverse outcomes.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pace.70218
DOI
10.1111/pace.70218
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Dae Hoon(김대훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9736-450X
Kim, In-Soo(김인수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-5514
Kim, Jong Youn(김종윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-8771
Kim, Tae-Hoon(김태훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-3456
Park, Je Wook(박제욱)
Park, Hanjin(박한진)
Pak, Hui Nam(박희남) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-3620
Uhm, Jae Sun(엄재선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-8172
Yu, Hee Tae(유희태) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-4759
Lee, Moon-Hyoung(이문형) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-0741
Lee, Hye Jeong(이혜정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-9174
Joung, Bo Young(정보영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-7225
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211862
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links