0 3

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Breast Cancers Detected and Missed by AI-CAD: Results from the AI-STREAM Trial

Authors
 Chang, Yun-Woo  ;  Ryu, Jung Kyu  ;  An, Jin Kyung  ;  Choi, Nami  ;  Park, Young Mi  ;  Ko, Kyung Hee 
Citation
 RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, Vol.8(1), 2026-01 
Article Number
 e250281 
Journal Title
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
ISSN
 2638-6100 
Issue Date
2026-01
MeSH
Aged ; Artificial Intelligence* ; Breast / diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted* / methods ; Early Detection of Cancer / methods ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography* / methods ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity
Keywords
Breast Cancer ; Mammography ; AI CAD
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the characteristics of breast cancers detected and missed by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) during screening mammography. Materials and Methods: This retrospective secondary analysis was conducted using data from the Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Mammography trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05024591), a prospective, multicenter cohort study performed from 2021 to 2022. AI-CAD results were categorized into nine subgroups based on abnormality scores (in 10% increments). Positive predictive values of recall (PPV1s) were calculated for each subgroup and by breast density, and AI-CAD scores were compared with mammographic and pathologic features. Results: A total of 24 543 women (mean age +/- SD, 59.8 years +/- 11.2), including two with bilateral cancer, were included; 148 cancers were confirmed by pathologic evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. AI-CAD results were negative in 23 010 cases (93.8%) and positive in 1535 (6.2%). The overall PPV1 was 8.7% (133 of 1535), with a sensitivity of 89.9% and specificity of 94.3%; PPV1 increased with higher abnormality scores but remained below 3% in groups 1 and 3 for dense breasts. AI-CAD detected 3.4% (five of 148) of cancers missed by radiologists but missed 8.1% (12 of 148) that were detected at radiologist recall. Abnormality scores were lower in patients presenting with mammographic asymmetry (P = .001) and luminal A subtype (P = .032). Conclusion: AI-CAD shows potential to improve breast cancer detection in screening programs and to support radiologists in mammogram interpretation. Understanding the imaging and pathologic features of cancers detected or missed by AI-CAD may enhance its effective clinical application. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05024591
Full Text
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/ryai.250281
DOI
10.1148/ryai.250281
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ko, Kyung Hee(고경희)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211340
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links