7 22

Cited 0 times in

Deep learning-based reconstruction for three-dimensional volumetric brain MRI: a qualitative and quantitative assessment

Authors
 Yeseul Kang  ;  Sang-Young Kim  ;  Jun Hwee Kim  ;  Nak-Hoon Son  ;  Chae Jung Park 
Citation
 BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, Vol.25(1) : 102, 2025-03 
Journal Title
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING
Issue Date
2025-03
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Brain* / diagnostic imaging ; Deep Learning* ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Young Adult
Keywords
Compressed sensing ; Deep learning ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Qualitative assessment ; Quantitative assessment
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) based on Adaptive-Compressed sensing (CS)-Network for brain MRI and validate it in a clinical setting.

Methods: Ten healthy volunteers and 22 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. Volunteers underwent 3D brain MRI including T1 without CS factor (9:16 min, reference standard); with CS factor of 2 without DLR (CS2, 4:6 min); with CS factor of 2 with DLR (DLR-CS2); with CS factor of 4 without DLR (CS4, 2:6 min); and with CS factor of 4 with DLR (DLR-CS4). The patients' MRI included the CS2 and DLR-CS4. The volumes of lateral ventricles, hippocampus, choroid plexus, and white matter hypointensity were calculated and compared among the sequences. Three radiologists independently assessed anatomical conspicuity, overall image quality, artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and sharpness using a 5-point scale for each sequence.

Results: Applying acceleration factors of 2 and 4 reduced the scan time to 65.4% and 33.5%, respectively, of that of the reference standard. Volumes of all the measured subregions showed no significant differences among different sequences in all participants. In qualitative analysis, the interrater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.844-0.926). In volunteers, quality of DLR-CS4 were comparable to those of CS2 for all metrics except for the overall image quality and SNR despite a 51.2% scan time reduction. In patients, DLR-CS4 showed quality comparable to that of CS2 for all metrics.

Conclusions: DLR allowed the scan time reduction by at least half without sacrificing image quality and volumetric quantification accuracy, supporting its reliability and efficiency.
Files in This Item:
T202502934.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s12880-025-01647-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jun-Hwee(김준휘)
Park, Chae Jung(박채정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-8658
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/205977
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links