0 148

Cited 1 times in

Large Institutional Experience of Early Outcomes and Dosimetric Findings with Postoperative Stereotactic Partial Breast Irradiation in Breast Cancer

Authors
 Jee Suk Chang  ;  Jeongshim Lee  ;  Frank A Vicini  ;  Jin Sung Kim  ;  Jihun Kim  ;  Seo Hee Choi  ;  Ik Jae Lee  ;  Yong Bae Kim 
Citation
 RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, Vol.191 : 110066, 2024-02 
Journal Title
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0167-8140 
Issue Date
2024-02
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the dosimetric and toxicity outcomes of patients treated with postoperative stereotactic partial breast irradiation (S-PBI).

Methods: We identified 799 women who underwent S-PBI at our institution between January 2016 and December 2022. The most commonly used dose-fraction and technique were 30 Gy in 5 fractions (91.7%) and a robotic stereotactic radiation system with real-time tracking (83.7%). The primary endpoints were dosimetric parameters and radiation-related toxicities. For comparison, a control group undergoing ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (UF-WBI, n=468) at the same institution was selected.

Results: A total of 815 breasts from 799 patients, with a median planning target volume (PTV) volume of 89.6 cm3, were treated with S-PBI. Treatment plans showed that the mean and maximum doses received by the PTV were 96.2% and 104.8% of the prescription dose, respectively. The volume of the ipsilateral breast that received 50% of the prescription dose was 32.3±8.9%. The mean doses for the ipsilateral lung and heart were 2.5±0.9 Gy and 0.65±0.39 Gy, respectively. Acute toxicity occurred in 175 patients (21.5%), predominantly of grade 1. Overall rate of late toxicity was 4% with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. Compared to the UF-WBI group, the S-PBI group had comparably low acute toxicity (21.5% vs. 25.2%, p=.12) but significantly lower dosimetric parameters for all organs-at-risks (all p<.05).

Conclusion: In this large cohort, S-PBI demonstrated favorable dosimetric and toxicity profiles. Considering the reduced radiation exposure to surrounding tissues, external beam PBI with advanced techniques should at least be considered over traditional WBI-based approaches for PBI candidates.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814023093738
DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110066
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Yong Bae(김용배) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-6862
Kim, Jihun(김지훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-6305
Kim, Jinsung(김진성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-6471
Lee, Ik Jae(이익재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-3373
Lee, Jeong Shim(이정심)
Chang, Jee Suk(장지석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-3382
Choi, Seo Hee(최서희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-6414
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197813
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links