0 170

Cited 1 times in

Impact of boost sequence in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme

Authors
 Nalee Kim  ;  Joongyo Lee  ;  Do-Hyun Nam  ;  Jung-Il Lee  ;  Ho Jun Seol  ;  Doo-Sik Kong  ;  Jung Won Choi  ;  Kyuha Chong  ;  Won Jae Lee  ;  Jong Hee Chang  ;  Seok-Gu Kang  ;  Ju Hyung Moon  ;  Jaeho Cho  ;  Do Hoon Lim  ;  Hong In Yoon 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, Vol.162(2) : 261-268, 2023-11 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0167-594X 
Issue Date
2023-11
MeSH
Brain Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Brain Neoplasms* / therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy / methods ; Glioblastoma* / drug therapy ; Glioblastoma* / therapy ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies
Keywords
Boost ; Glioblastoma multiforme ; Radiotherapy
Abstract
Background: The standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal surgical resection followed by conventional fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal boost technique for CCRT in GBM.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 398 patients treated with CCRT between 2016 and 2021, using data from two institutional databases. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving sequential boost (SEB, N = 119) and those receiving simultaneous integrated boost (SIB, N = 279). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To minimize differences between the SIB and SEB groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Results: The median follow-up period was 18.6 months. Before PSM, SEB showed better OS compared to SIB (2-year, 55.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.014). However, after PSM, there was no significant difference between two groups (2-year, 55.6% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.300). The boost sequence was not associated with inferior OS before and after PSM (all p-values > 0.05). Additionally, the rates of symptomatic pseudo-progression were similar between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.75, p = 0.055).

Conclusions: This study found no significant difference in OS between SEB and SIB for GBM patients treated with CCRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal boost techniques for this patient population.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11060-023-04465-6
DOI
10.1007/s11060-023-04465-6
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Seok Gu(강석구) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-2037
Moon, Ju Hyung(문주형)
Yoon, Hong In(윤홍인) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2106-6856
Lee, Joongyo(이준교)
Chang, Jong Hee(장종희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9800
Cho, Jae Ho(조재호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-5157
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197488
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links