0 65

Cited 0 times in

The Consecutive 200 Cases of Endoscopic-Combined Intrarenal Surgery: Comparison between Standard and Miniature Surgeries

Authors
 Young Joon Moon  ;  Kang Su Cho  ;  Dae Chul Jung  ;  Doo Yong Chung  ;  Joo Yong Lee 
Citation
 MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, Vol.59(11) : 1971, 2023-11 
Journal Title
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
ISSN
 1010-660X 
Issue Date
2023-11
Keywords
kidney ; lithotripsy ; nephrolithiasis ; urinary calculi
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still the gold-standard treatment for large and/or complex renal stones. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was developed with the goal of minimizing the number of access tracts of PCNL while simultaneously improving the one-step stone-free rate (SFR). The aim of this study was to share the experience of the consecutive 200 cases of ECIRS in one institute and analyze surgical outcomes of mini-ECIRS and standard ECIRS.

Materials and Methods: We performed ECIRS for 200 adult patients between July 2017 and January 2020. An ECIRS was performed with the patient under general anesthesia in the intermediate-supine position. Surgeries were finished using a tubeless technique with a simple ureteral stent insertion.

Results: There were significant differences in the mean maximal stone length (MSL), the variation coefficient of stone density (VCSD), the linear calculus density (LCD), the Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC), and the modified S-ReSC scores in stone characteristics, and estimated blood loss (EBL) and operation time in peri-operative outcomes between conventional and mini-ECIRS. After propensity-score matching, there was only a difference in EBL between the two groups. In logistic regression models, MSL [odds ratio (OR) 0.953; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.926-0.979; p < 0.001], LCD (OR 4.702; 95% CI 1.613-18.655; p = 0.013) were significant factors for the success rate after ECIRS.

Conclusions: In patients who underwent a mini-ECIRS, the stones were relatively smaller and less complex, and the operation time was shorter. However, if the size of stones was similar, there was no difference in the success rate, but EBL was lower in mini-ECIRS than in standard surgery.
Full Text
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2893083752
DOI
10.3390/medicina59111971
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Moon, Young Joon(문영준)
Lee, Joo Yong(이주용) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-1767
Jung, Dae Chul(정대철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-5083
Cho, Kang Su(조강수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3500-8833
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196782
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links