Time efficiency and efficacy of a centralized computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing workflow for implant crown fabrication: A prospective controlled clinical study

Abstract

Objective: To assess time efficiency and the efficacy of the prosthetic manufacturing for implant crown fabrication in a centralized workflow applying computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). Material and Methods: Fifty-nine patients with one posterior implant each, were randomly allocated to either a centralized digital workflow (c-DW, test) or a laboratory digital workflow (l-DW, control). Patients were excluded from efficiency and efficacy analyses, if any additional restoration than this single implant crown had to be fabricated. A customized titanium abutment and a monolithic zirconia crown were fabricated in the c-DW. In the l-DW, models were digitalized for CAD-CAM fabrication of a monolithic zirconia crown using a standardized titanium base abutment. Time for impression, laboratory operating and delivery time were recorded. The efficacy of the prosthetic manufacturing was evaluated at try-in and at delivery. Data was analyzed descriptively. Sta-tistical analyses using student&apos;s unpaired t-and paired Wilcoxon were performed (p < 0.05). Results: At impression taking, 12 patients (c-DW) and 19 patients (l-DW) were included. The impression time was 9.4 +/- 3.5 min (c-DW) and 15.1 +/- 4.6 min (l-DW) (p < 0.05). The laboratory operating time was 130 +/- 31 min (c-DW) and 218.0 +/- 8 min (l-DW) (p < 0.05). The delivery time was significantly longer in the c-DW (5.9 +/- 3.5 1 days) as compared to the l-DW (0.5 +/- 0.05 days). At try-in and at delivery, efficacy of prosthetic manufacturing was similar high in both workflows. Clinical relevance: The c-DW was more time efficient compared to the lab-DW and rendered a similar efficacy of prosthetic manufacturing.