0 179

Cited 4 times in

Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot international survey

Authors
 An Tang  ;  Karma Abukasm  ;  Guilherme Moura Cunha  ;  Bin Song  ;  Jin Wang  ;  Mathilde Wagner  ;  Christoph F Dietrich  ;  Giuseppe Brancatelli  ;  Kazuhiko Ueda  ;  Jin-Young Choi  ;  Diego Aguirre  ;  Claude B Sirlin 
Citation
 ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, Vol.46(1) : 205-215, 2021-01 
Journal Title
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
ISSN
 2366-004X 
Issue Date
2021-01
MeSH
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* / diagnostic imaging ; Contrast Media ; Europe ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; North America ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Ultrasonography
Keywords
Clinical practice ; Diagnosis ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Imaging ; Standardization
Abstract
Purpose: To perform an international survey on current practices in imaging-based surveillance, diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response for HCC.

Materials and methods: Three themes were covered in this international survey: demographics of respondents and liver imaging expertise; imaging practices for screening, surveillance, diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response for HCC; and diagnostic imaging systems used. Descriptive summaries were created.

Results: Of 151 respondents, 22.5% were from Asia, 6.0% from Europe, 19.9% from North America, 26.5% from South America, and 25.2% from Australasia; 57.0% respondents worked in academic and 34.4% in private or mixed settings. Non-contrast ultrasound was most commonly used for screening and surveillance of HCC (90.7%), and multiphase computed tomography was used for diagnosis (96.0%). Extracellular contrast agents (69.5%) were the most commonly used MRI contrast agents and Lumason/SonoVue (31.1%) is the most commonly used contrast-enhanced ultrasound contrast agent. A majority (94.0%) of respondents use ancillary imaging features for assessment of liver lesions in at-risk patients. Usage of diagnostic imaging systems for HCC varied by region. RECIST or mRECIST criteria were most commonly used for assessing HCC treatment response (48.3%). Most respondents agreed that a standardized classification for the diagnosis of HCC is needed (68.9%) and that an atlas and lexicon would help improve inter-reader agreement (71.5%).

Conclusion: Practices and recommendations for imaging of HCC vary between geographical regions. Future efforts to develop a unified system should address regional differences and potential barriers for adoption of a standardized diagnostic system for HCC.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-020-02598-0
DOI
10.1007/s00261-020-02598-0
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Jin Young(최진영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-6274
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191092
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links