국내 학술지에 게재된 영성 관련 측정도구의 측정속성: 체계적 문헌고찰

Abstract

J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs > Volume 28(1); 2021 > Article

Original Article J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2021; 28(1): 133-148.

Published online: February 26, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.1.133

국내 학술지에 게재된 영성 관련 측정도구의 측정속성: 체계적 문헌고찰 고일선1), 김진숙2), 최소영3) 1)전 연세대학교 간호대학 교수

2)우송대학교 간호학과 교수

3)펜실베이니아주립대학교 간호대학 대학원생

A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties of Spirituality related Assessment Tools Published in Korean Journals Il-Sun Ko1), Jin Sook Kim2), Soyoung Choi3) 1)Former Professor, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul

2)Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea

3)Graduate Student, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA

Corresponding author: Kim, Jin Sook https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-6979 Department of Nursing, Woosong University 171 Dongdaejeon-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34606, Korea Tel: +82-42-630-9294, Fax: +82-42-630-9299, E-mail: somach87@hanmail.net

*This study was supported by the Research Grant of College of Nursing, Yonsei University in 2016 (NO: 6-2016-0150).

*본 연구는 2016년도 연세대학교 간호대학 학과연구지원에 의해 수행되었음(과제번호: 6-2016-0150).

Received July 30, 2020 Revised November 13, 2020 Accepted February 2, 2021 © 2021 Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of spirituality-related assessment tools published in Korean journals. Methods The databases used to search the literature reporting use of the spirituality-related assessment tools were RISS, NDSL, DBpia, KoreaMed, and KISS. The quality of the measurement properties was evaluated based on the reported internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, responsiveness, floor-ceiling effects and interpretability based on the tools review criteria suggested by Terwee et al. Results Twenty-five assessment tools (including 7 original Korean versions) were identified from the 208 Korean studies published up to November, 2016. All of the 25 tools reported internal consistency and content validity; construct validity was reported in 21 tools while only six tools had reported on criterion validity. None of the studies reported on the reproducibility, responsiveness, and floor-ceiling effects. Among 25 spirituality-related assessment tools, the spiritual well-being scale was identified as the most commonly used tool for spirituality assessment. Conclusion Among 25 spirituality-related assessment tools used in Korean studies, all of them satisfied only three criteria out of the eight criteria for measurement properties, internal consistency, content validity, and interpretability. The results of this study provide evidence to develop reliable and valid tools that will satisfy the criteria for measurement properties. In addition, standardized, reliable, and valid assessment tools must be chosen for spirituality-related study.