0 338

Cited 0 times in

Deep Learning Application in Spinal Implant Identification

Authors
 Hee-Seok Yang  ;  Kwang-Ryeol Kim  ;  Sungjun Kim  ;  Jeong-Yoon Park 
Citation
 SPINE, Vol.46(5) : E318-E324, 2021-03 
Journal Title
SPINE
ISSN
 0362-2436 
Issue Date
2021-03
MeSH
Adult ; Algorithms* ; Deep Learning* / trends ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Fixators* / trends ; Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging* ; Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Radiography / trends ; Retrospective Studies
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Objective: To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning.

Summary of background data: Deep learning has recently been actively applied to medical images. However, despite many attempts to apply deep learning to medical images, the application has rarely been successful. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of deep learning in the medical field. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning.

Methods: For deep learning algorithm development, radiographs were retrospectively obtained from clinical cases in which the patients had lumbar spine one-segment instrument surgery. A total of 2894 lumbar spine anteroposterior (AP: 1446 cases) and lateral (1448 cases) radiographs were collected. Labeling work was conducted for five different implants. We conducted experiments using three deep learning algorithms. The traditional deep neural network model built by coding the transfer learning algorithm, Google AutoML, and Apple Create ML. Recall (sensitivity) and precision (specificity) were measured after training.

Results: Overall, each model performed well in identifying each pedicle screw implant. In conventional transfer learning, AP radiography showed 97.0% precision and 96.7% recall. Lateral radiography showed 98.7% precision and 98.2% recall. In Google AutoML, AP radiography showed 91.4% precision and 87.4% recall; lateral radiography showed 97.9% precision and 98.4% recall. In Apple Create ML, AP radiography showed 76.0% precision and 73.0% recall; lateral radiography showed 89.0% precision and 87.0% recall. In all deep learning algorithms, precision and recall were higher in lateral than in AP radiography.

Conclusion: The deep learning application is effective for spinal implant identification. This demonstrates that clinicians can use ML-based deep learning applications to improve clinical practice and patient care.Level of Evidence: 3.
Full Text
https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2021/03010/Deep_Learning_Application_in_Spinal_Implant.12.aspx
DOI
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003844
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sungjun(김성준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-7901
Park, Jeong Yoon(박정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-7784
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/186867
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links