0 261

Cited 0 times in

Periodontal Repair in Intrabony Defects Treated With a Calcium Carbonate Implant and Guided Tissue Regeneration

Authors
 Chong-Kwan Kim  ;  Eun-Jeong Choi  ;  Kyoo-Sung Cho  ;  Jung-Kiu Chai  ;  Ulf M.E. Wikesjö 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, Vol.67(12) : 1301-1306, 1996-01 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN
 0022-3492 
Issue Date
1996-01
MeSH
Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss / surgery* ; Analysis of Variance ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Bone Substitutes* ; Calcium Carbonate* ; Female ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal / methods* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Periodontal Pocket / surgery* ; Prostheses and Implants* ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgical Flaps ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Clinical outcome following the concurrent use of a porous resorbable calcium carbonate (CC) implant and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony periodontal defects was evaluated in a randomized four-treatment parallel arm study. Eighty (80) patients, each contributing one interproximal intrabony defect, were assigned to the four treatments (20 patients per treatment) including the CC implant and GTR (CC+GTR), GTR alone (GTR control), CC implant alone (CC control), and gingival flap surgery alone (GFS control). Fourteen patients treated with CC+GTR, 19 patients treated with the GTR control, 13 patients treated with the CC control, and 18 patients treated with the GFS control completed the study. Clinical healing was evaluated 6 months postsurgery and included changes in probing depth, clinical attachment level, probing bone level, and gingival recession. Postsurgery probing depth reduction was 4.5 ± 1.7 mm (CC+GTR; P < 0.01), 4.8 ± 1.8 mm (GTR; P < 0.01), 3.7 ± 2.2 mm (CC; P < 0.01), and 3.3 ± 1.6 mm (GFS; P < 0.01). Clinical attachment gain amounted to 3.3 ± 1.4 mm (CC+GTR; P < 0.01), 4.0 ± 2.1 mm (GTR; P < 0.01), 3.0 ± 2.4 mm (CC; P < 0.01), and 2.0 ± 1.7 mm (GFS; P < 0.01). The CC+GTR and GTR treatments exhibited significantly greater improvements compared to GFS (P < 0.05). Postsurgery probing bone level gain amounted to 4.0 ± 1.7 mm (CC+GTR; P < 0.01), 4.1 ± 1.5 mm (GTR; P < 0.01), 4.0 ± 2.2 mm (CC; P < 0.01), and 0.5 ± 2.0 mm (GFS; P > 0.05). The CC+GTR, GTR, and CC treatments exhibited significantly greater improvements compared to GFS (P < 0.05). Gingival recession increased significantly compared to presurgery for GTR, CC, and GFS treatments (−0.9 ± 1.2, −0.7 ± 0.7, and −1.2 ± 1.4 mm, respectively; P < 0.01). The results suggest that the concurrent use of a porous resorbable CC implant and GTR has limited adjunctive effect in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. J Periodontol 1996;67:1301–1306.
Full Text
http://www.joponline.org/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.1996.67.12.1301
DOI
10.1902/jop.1996.67.12.1301
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Periodontics (치주과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Chong Kwan(김종관)
Cho, Kyoo Sung(조규성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-5287
Chai, Jung Kyu(채중규)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/183721
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links