45 138

Cited 0 times in

Forgoing life-sustaining treatment - a comparative analysis of regulations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England

Authors
 Tanaka, Miho  ;  Kodama, Satoshi  ;  Lee, Ilhak  ;  Huxtable, Richard  ;  Chung, Yicheng 
Citation
 BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, Vol.21(1) : 99, 2020-10 
Journal Title
 BMC MEDICAL ETHICS 
ISSN
 1472-6939 
Issue Date
2020-10
Keywords
Forgoing (withholding and withdrawing) life-sustaining treatment ; End-of-life care ; Law ; Guideline ; Japan ; Korea ; Taiwan ; England
Abstract
Background Regulations on forgoing life-sustaining treatment (LST) have developed in Asian countries including Japan, Korea and Taiwan. However, other countries are relatively unaware of these due to the language barrier. This article aims to describe and compare the relevant regulatory frameworks, using the (more familiar) situation in England as a point of reference. We undertook literature reviews to ascertain the legal and regulatory positions on forgoing LST in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England. Main text Findings from a literature review are first presented to describe the development of the regulatory frameworks surrounding the option of forgoing LST in each country. Based on the findings from the four countries, we suggest five ethically important points, reflection on which should help to inform the further development of regulatory frameworks concerning end-of-life care in these countries and beyond. There should be reflection on: (1) the definition of - and reasons for defining - the 'terminal stage' and associated criteria for making such judgements; Korea and Taiwan limit forgoing LST to patients in this stage, but there are risks associated with defining this too narrowly or broadly; (2) foregoing LST for patients who arenotin this stage, as is allowed in Japan and England, because here too there are areas of controversy, including (in England) whether the law in this area does enough to respect the autonomy of (now) incapacitated patients; (3) whether 'foregoing' LST should encompass withholdingandwithdrawing treatment; this is also an ethically disputed area, particularly in the Asian countries we examine; (4) the family's role in end-of-life decision-making, particularly as, compared with England, the three Asian countries traditionally place a greater emphasis on families and communities than on individuals; and (5) decision-making with and for those incapacitated patients who lack families, surrogate decision-makers or ADs. Conclusion Comparison of, and reflection on, the different legal positions that obtain in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England should prove informative and we particularly invite reflection on five areas, in the hope the ensuing discussions will help to establish better end-of-life regulatory frameworks in these countries and elsewhere.
Files in This Item:
T202006452.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s12910-020-00535-w
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences (인문사회의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Il Hak(이일학) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-8752
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/181809
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links