7 10

Cited 0 times in

Removal of large middle molecules via haemodialysis with medium cut-off membranes at lower blood flow rates: an observational prospective study

Authors
 Tae Hoon Kim  ;  Seok-hyung Kim  ;  Tae Yeon Kim  ;  Hae Yeul Park  ;  Kwon Soo Jung  ;  Moon Hyoung Lee  ;  Jong Hyun Jhee  ;  Jung Eun Lee  ;  Hoon Young Choi  ;  Hyeong Cheon Park 
Citation
 BMC NEPHROLOGY, Vol.21(1) : 2, 2020 
Journal Title
 BMC NEPHROLOGY 
Issue Date
2020
Keywords
Haemodialysis ; Large middle molecules ; Medium cut-off membrane ; Predilution online haemodiafiltration ; Uraemic toxins
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) may improve middle molecular clearance in contrast to conventional haemodialysis (HD). However, OL-HDF requires higher convective flows and cannot sufficiently remove large middle molecules. This study evaluated the efficacy of a medium cut-off (MCO) dialyser in removing large middle molecular uraemic toxins and compared it with that of conventional high-flux (HF) dialysers in HD and predilution OL-HDF. METHODS: Six clinically stable HD patients without residual renal function were investigated. Dialyser and treatment efficacies were examined during a single midweek treatment in three consecutive periods: 1) conventional HD using an HF dialyser, 2) OL-HDF using the same HF dialyser, and 3) conventional HD using an MCO dialyser. Treatment efficacy was assessed by calculating the reduction ratio (RR) for β2-microglobulin (β2M), myoglobin, κ and λ free light chains (FLCs), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 and measuring clearance for FLCs. RESULTS: All three treatments showed comparable RRs for urea, phosphate, creatinine, and uric acid. MCO HD showed greater RRs for myoglobin and λFLC than did HF HD and predilution OL-HDF (myoglobin: 63.1 ± 5.3% vs. 43.5 ± 8.9% and 49.8 ± 7.3%; λFLC: 43.2 ± 5.6% vs. 26.8 ± 4.4% and 33.0 ± 9.2%, respectively; P <  0.001). Conversely, predilution OL-HDF showed the greatest RR for β2M, whereas MCO HD and HF HD showed comparable RRs for β2M (predilution OL-HDF vs. MCO HD: 80.1 ± 4.9% vs. 72.6 ± 3.8%, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference among MCO HD, HF HD, and predilution OL-HDF in the RRs for κFLC (63.2 ± 6.0%, 53.6 ± 15.5%, and 61.5 ± 7.0%, respectively; P = 0.37), and FGF-23 (55.5 ± 20.3%, 34.6 ± 13.1%, and 35.8 ± 23.2%, respectively; P = 0.13). Notably, MCO HD showed improved clearances for FLCs when compared to HF HD or OL-HDF. CONCLUSIONS: MCO HD showed significantly greater RR of large middle molecules and achieved improved clearance for FLCs than conventional HD and OL-HDF, without the need for large convection volumes or high blood flow rates. This would pose as an advantage for elderly HD patients with poor vascular access and HD patients without access to OL-HDF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS): KCT 0003009. The trial was prospectively registered on the 21 Jul 2018.
Files in This Item:
T202000107.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s12882-019-1669-3
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Hae Yeul(박해열)
Park, Hyeong Cheon(박형천) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-0812
Lee, Moon Hyoung(이문형)
Jung, Kwon Soo(정권수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-5139
Jhee, Jong Hyun(지종현)
Choi, Hoon Young(최훈영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4245-0339
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/174894
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse