95 110

Cited 0 times in

췌장종양의 진단 : 자기공명췌관촬영술(MRP)과 내시경역행췌관조영술(ERP)과의 비교

Other Titles
 Diagnosis of Pancreatic Tumors: Comparison of MR Pancreatograp hy (MRP )and Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography(ERP) 
Authors
 노기서  ;  서정훈  ;  김명진  ;  정재복  ;  정재준  ;  이종태  ;  유형식 
Citation
 Journal of the Korean Radiologist Society (대한방사선의학회지), Vol.41(5) : 963-969, 1999 
Journal Title
Journal of the Korean Radiologist Society(대한방사선의학회지)
ISSN
 0301-2867 
Issue Date
1999
Keywords
Pancreas, neoplasms ; Pancreas, MR ; Pancreas, ERCP
Abstract
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance pancreatography(MRP) is a non-invasive imaging technique for visualization of the pancreatic duct system, and is similar to those obtained by means of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). To determine the role of MRP in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, the diagnostic confidence and imaginal difference of MRP and ERP were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (13 male and 7 female, mean age 59 years) with pancreatic tumors underwent MRP and ERP. The former involved the use of a single shot fast spinecho sequence on a 1.5T system. All images were retrospectively reviewed by a radiologist and a gastroenterologist, working together. Both MRP and ERP were compared for separate visualization of the head, body and tail portion of the pancreatic duct, and scored as excellent (4), good (3), fair (2), poor (1), or no visualization (0). In addition, the overall diagnostic confidence of both modalities was graded subjectively from non-diagnoses (0) to definite information (4). The final diagnoses derived from surgical findings (n=9) or imaging findings and clinical follow-up (n=7) were as follows : pancreatic cancer (n=12), mucin-producing pancreatic cancer (n=2), mucinous ductectatic tumor (n=4), serous cystadenoma (n=2). To assess the statistical significance of difference, the paired t-test was used. RESULTS: Mean scores of visualization of the pancreatic duct by MRP and ERP were 2.91 and 3.15 in the pancreatic head (p=NS), 3.11 and 2.18 in the pancreatic body (p=NS), and 3.07 and 1.09 in the pancreatic tail (p<0.01). The mean score of diagnostic confidence was 4.03 for MRP and 2.51 for ERP, a statistically significant difference (p <0.05). In 11 patients with obstruction of the pancreatic duct due to malignant lesions, MRP visualized the duct both proximally and distally to the site of obstruction, while ERP visualized only the distal duct to the site of obstruction. MRP was also better at defining the extent of tumor by visualization of surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. In two cases of serous cystadenoma with lack of communication between the pancreatic duct and cystic neoplasm, MRP depicted the lesion clearly whereas ERP showed no information. CONCLUSION: MRP is better than ERP at visualizing the of pancreatic duct proximal to obstruction, assessment of tumoral extent, and diagnosis of a cystic neoplasm which does not communicate with the pancreatic duct.
Files in This Item:
T199901920.pdf Download
DOI
10.3348/jkrs.1999.41.5.963
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Myeong Jin(김명진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-5402
Yoo, Hyung Sik(유형식)
Lee, Jong Tae(이종태)
Chung, Jae Bock(정재복)
Chung, Jae Joon(정재준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-1193
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/174085
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links