0 72

Cited 4 times in

Bacteremia Prediction Model for Community-acquired Pneumonia: External Validation in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort

Authors
 Byunghyun Kim  ;  Jungho Choi  ;  Kyuseok Kim  ;  Sujin Jang  ;  Tae Gun Shin  ;  Won Young Kim  ;  Jung‐Youn Kim  ;  Yoo Seok Park  ;  Soo Hyun Kim  ;  Hui Jai Lee  ;  Jonghwan Shin  ;  Je Sung You  ;  Kyung Su Kim  ;  Sung Phil Chung 
Citation
 Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol.24(10) : 1226-1234, 2017 
Journal Title
 Academic Emergency Medicine 
ISSN
 1069-6563 
Issue Date
2017
MeSH
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteremia/diagnosis* ; Bacteremia/etiology ; Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis ; Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pneumonia/complications ; Pneumonia/diagnosis* ; Predictive Value of Tests ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Many studies have described constructing a prediction model for bacteremia in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but these studies were not validated in external heterogeneous groups. The objective of this study was to test the generalizability of a previous bacteremia prediction model for CAP by external validation. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis was performed in eight tertiary urban hospital emergency departments (EDs). We reviewed adult patients who were hospitalized after presentation to the ED with CAP. We categorized the enrolled patients into three groups according to the bacteremia prediction model score and calculated the number of patients with or without a blood culture-positive result. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify significant predictors for bacteremia. RESULTS: Among the enrolled 2,001 patients, 1,592 (79.6%), 371 (18.5%), and 38 (1.9%) were stratified to a low-, moderate-, and high-risk group, respectively, and this proportion was similar with previous study. Each group had a bacteremia-positive rate as follows: 1.2% for the low-risk group, 7.2% for the moderate-risk group, and 31.5% for the high-risk group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the bacteremia model in the external validation cohort was 0.81, and there was no significant difference with that of the previous internal validation cohort (p = 0.246). Assuming that blood cultures were not performed in the low-risk patients, the sensitivity and specificity of this model were 0.68 and 0.81, respectively. Additionally, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 9.54 and 98.87%, respectively. A platelet count less than 130 × 109 cells/L, albumin less than 3.3 mg/dL, and C-reactive protein greater than 17 mg/dL were identified as significant predictors with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.70 and 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSION: The bacteremia prediction model was well validated in the general population and could help physicians make the decision to reduce the number of blood cultures in patients with CAP.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acem.13255
DOI
10.1111/acem.13255
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Emergency Medicine (응급의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
박유석(Park, Yoo Seok) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-4664
유제성(You, Je Sung) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-6745
정성필(Chung, Sung Pil) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3074-011X
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165615
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse