0 117

Cited 9 times in

Comparative study between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer

Authors
 Kyu Yeon Hahn  ;  Chan Hyuk Park  ;  Yong Kang Lee  ;  Hyunsoo Chung  ;  Jun Chul Park  ;  Sung Kwan Shin  ;  Yong Chan Lee  ;  Hyoung-Il Kim  ;  Jae-Ho Cheong  ;  Woo Jin Hyung  ;  Sung Hoon Noh  ;  Sang Kil Lee 
Citation
 Surgical Endoscopy , Vol.32(1) : 73-86, 2018 
Journal Title
 Surgical Endoscopy  
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2018
Keywords
Absolute indication ; Endoscopic submucosal dissection ; Expanded indication ; Outcomes ; Undifferentiated histology
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who have a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between ESD and surgery in patients with EGC that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD on their final pathologic report. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent gastric ESD and surgery between January 2007 and December 2012. Patients with pathologically confirmed EGC that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD on their final pathologic report were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 2023 patients, 817 (40.4%) underwent ESD and 1206 (59.6%) underwent surgery. The proportion of cases meeting the absolute indication was significantly higher in the ESD group than in the surgery group (66.0 vs. 26.2%). Lesions on the middle third, >3 cm in size, flat or depressed, and of undifferentiated histology were significantly more common in the surgery group than in the ESD group. The ESD group showed lower acute complication rates [8.1% (66 of 817) vs. 18.1% (218 of 1206), P </= 0.001] and procedure-related mortality [0 vs. 0.3% (4 of 1206), P = 0.153] than the surgical group. The annual incidence of recurrent gastric cancer was 2.18% in the ESD group and 0.19% in the surgery group. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were not significantly different between the ESD group and the surgery group (overall survival: 96.4 vs. 97.2%, P = 0.423; disease-specific survival: 99.6 vs. 99.2%, P = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: Although EGC lesions had poorer features in the surgery group than in the ESD group, ESD was comparable to surgery for EGCs that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD, with lower rates of acute complication and comparable overall survival.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-017-5640-8
DOI
10.1007/s00464-017-5640-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hyoung Il(김형일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Noh, Sung Hoon(노성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-6886
Park, Jun Chul(박준철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-0010
Lee, Sang Kil(이상길) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-0364
Cheong, Jae Ho(정재호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-1781
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/162003
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse