0 213

Cited 2 times in

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Radiologic Pigtail-Retained Gastrostomy and Radiologic Mushroom-Retained Gastrostomy

Authors
 Kichang Han  ;  Man-Deuk Kim  ;  Joon Ho Kwon  ;  Yong Seek Kim  ;  Gyoung Min Kim  ;  Junhyung Lee  ;  Woosun Choi  ;  Jong Yun Won  ;  Do Yun Lee 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, Vol.28(12) : 1702-1707, 2017 
Journal Title
 JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 
ISSN
 1051-0443 
Issue Date
2017
MeSH
Contrast Media ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Gastrostomy/instrumentation ; Gastrostomy/methods* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography, Interventional ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare 2 different types of percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy procedures (pigtail-retained gastrostomy [PG] vs mushroom-retained gastrostomy [MG]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2014 and February 2016, 100 patients were randomly assigned to receive 14-F PG or 20-F MG. Block randomization (block size 4) was performed, and sample size was calculated to assess the difference in minor complications. One patient withdrew from the study after allocation. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups (P > .05). Technical success, defined as successful placement of gastrostomy tube, and procedural complications were evaluated. Procedural complications were divided into major and minor complications according to the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 100%. In the PG group, the major complication rate was 2% (1 of 50); 1 patient had a misplaced PG in the peritoneal cavity between the gastric and abdominal walls and developed peritonitis that had to be surgically treated. The minor complication rate was 34% (17 of 50) in the PG group. In the MG group, the major complication rate was 0%, and the minor complication rate was 12.2% (6 of 49). The most common minor complication was tube occlusion. Minor complication rate was significantly higher in the PG group (P = .016). Mean fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the MG group (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Both PG and MG demonstrated high technical success rates in all indications. MG had lower complication rates than PG at the cost of an increase in fluoroscopy times.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051044317306395
DOI
10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.031
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, Joon Ho(권준호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-7252
Kim, Gyoung Min(김경민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-4396
Kim, Man Deuk(김만득) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-5847
Won, Jong Yun(원종윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-5628
Lee, Do Yun(이도연)
Lee, Junhyung(이준형) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5485
Han, Ki Chang(한기창) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-9757
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/161630
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links