429 419

Cited 8 times in

Rapid mycobacterial liquid culture-screening method for Mycobacterium avium complex based on secreted antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Authors
 Sung Jae Shin  ;  Kelly Anklam  ;  Elizabeth J. B. Manning  ;  Michael T. Collins 
Citation
 Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, Vol.16(5) : 613-620, 2009 
Journal Title
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
ISSN
 1556-6811 
Issue Date
2009
MeSH
Antigens, Bacterial/immunology ; Antigens, Bacterial/isolation & purification* ; Diagnostic Errors ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods ; Mass Screening/methods* ; Mycobacterium avium Complex/genetics ; Mycobacterium avium Complex/growth & development ; Mycobacterium avium Complex/isolation & purification* ; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection/diagnosis ; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection/microbiology ; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection/veterinary* ; Paratuberculosis/diagnosis* ; Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract
Sensors in automated liquid culture systems for mycobacteria, such as MGIT, BacT/Alert 3D, and Trek ESP II, flag growth of any type of bacteria; a positive signal does not mean that the target mycobacteria are present. All signal-positive cultures thus require additional and often laborious testing. An immunoassay was developed to screen liquid mycobacterial cultures for evidence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). The method, called the MAC-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), relies on detection of MAC-specific secreted antigens in liquid culture. Secreted MAC antigens were captured by the MAC-ELISA with polyclonal anti- Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis chicken immunoglobulin Y (IgY), detected using rabbit anti-MAC IgG, and then revealed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. When the MAC-ELISA was evaluated using pure cultures of known mycobacterial (n = 75) and nonmycobacterial (n = 17) organisms, no false-positive or false-negative MAC-ELISA results were found. By receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis of 1,275 previously identified clinical isolates, at the assay optimal cutoff the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the MAC-ELISA were 92.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 90.3 to 94.5) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.2 to 100), respectively, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.992. Prospective evaluation of the MAC-ELISA with an additional 652 clinical samples inoculated into MGIT ParaTB medium and signaling positive per the manufacturer's instructions found that the MAC-ELISA was effective in determining those cultures that actually contained MAC species and warranting the resources required to identify the organism by PCR. Of these 652 MGIT-positive cultures, the MAC-ELISA correctly identified 96.8% (of 219 MAC-ELISA-positive cultures) as truly containing MAC mycobacteria, based on PCR or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as reference tests. Only 6 of 433 MGIT signal-positive cultures (1.4%) were MAC-ELISA false negative, and only 7 of 219 MGIT signal-negative cultures (3.2%) were false positive. The MAC-ELISA is a low-cost, rapid, sensitive, and specific test for MAC in liquid cultures. It could be used in conjunction with or independent of automated culture reading instrumentation. For maximal accuracy and subspecies-specific identification, use of a confirmatory multiplex MAC PCR is recommended
Files in This Item:
T200906147.pdf Download
DOI
10.1128/CVI.00461-08
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Microbiology (미생물학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Sung Jae(신성재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-4582
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/106042
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links