941 330

Cited 0 times in

의료윤리 의사결정 방법론으로써 결의론의 가능성

Other Titles
 Casuistical Deliberation in Medical Ethics Consultation 
Authors
 이일학 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Medical Ethics (한국의료윤리학회지), Vol.13(4) : 281-292, 2010 
Journal Title
 Korean Journal of Medical Ethics (한국의료윤리학회지) 
ISSN
 2005-8284 
Issue Date
2010
Keywords
clinical ethics ; casuistry ; case-based approach ; medical ethics ; 임상윤리 ; 결의론 ; 사례중심의 접근 ; 의료윤리
Abstract
In this article casuistical deliberation is explained and examined in regards to whether or not it is suitable for clinical ethics deliberation. Casuistry is the analysis of moral issues using reasoning based on paradigms and analogies. Such case-based reasoning leads to the formation of expert opinions about moral obligations that are general but not universal or invariable. Casuists try to give guidance in cases in which no clear ethical principles can be applied and to categorize cases into paradigms and maxims. This article provides a casuistical analysis of a clinical case and arg
Files in This Item:
T201006044.pdf Download
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Medical Law and Bioethics (의료법윤리학과) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Il Hak(이일학) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6531-8752
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/103288
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse