3 600

Cited 48 times in

Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases

Authors
 Joon Im  ;  Jung-Yul Cha  ;  Kee-Joon Lee  ;  Hyung-Seog Yu  ;  Chung-Ju Hwang 
Citation
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, Vol.145(4) : 434-442, 2014 
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
ISSN
 0889-5406 
Issue Date
2014
MeSH
Anatomic Landmarks/pathology ; Bicuspid/surgery ; Calcium Sulfate/chemistry* ; Cephalometry/methods ; Dental Arch/pathology ; Dental Materials/chemistry* ; Dental Models* ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods* ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods* ; Lasers ; Malocclusion/therapy ; Mandible/pathology ; Maxilla/pathology ; Odontometry/methods ; Optical Imaging/methods ; Orthodontics, Corrective* ; Overbite/pathology ; Patient Care Planning ; Rotation ; Tooth/pathology ; Tooth Extraction* ; Torque ; User-Computer Interface*
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
The aim of this study was to compare the virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases by measuring various occlusal parameters and applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
METHODS:
Linear intra-arch and interarch dimensions (arch width and length, perimeter, overjet, and overbite), angular variables (tip, torque, and rotation), and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system scores obtained from a digital virtual setup model were compared with those from a plaster model setup.
RESULTS:
The digital virtual setup model resulted in smaller arch perimeters than did the plaster setup model by 2.20 mm in the maxillary arch (P <0.01) and 1.30 mm in the mandibular arch (P <0.05). The digital virtual setup also exhibited significantly lower values for overbite and overjet (P <0.01). The digital virtual setup had tendencies toward mesial angulation of the anterior teeth, labial inclination of the maxillary anterior teeth (P <0.05), and distal in-rotation of the mandibular teeth (P <0.05). The resulting American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system evaluation showed that larger deductions for overjet, occlusal contact, and total score (P <0.01) were required for the digital than for the manual setup model.
CONCLUSIONS:
Digital and manual setups lead to similar measurements for intra-arch and interarch occlusal variables. However, because of the possibility of collision on proximal and occlusal contact, delicate adjustments in proximal and occlusal contacts are required.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540613011141
DOI
10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.014
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Orthodontics (교정과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yu, Hyung Seog(유형석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-5078
Lee, Kee Joon(이기준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0782-3128
Cha, Jung Yul(차정열)
Hwang, Chung Ju(황충주) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-4551
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98415
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links