3 703

Cited 20 times in

Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: diffusion-weighted imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김기황-
dc.contributor.author김대중-
dc.contributor.author김주희-
dc.contributor.author유정식-
dc.contributor.author정재준-
dc.contributor.author정진-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T17:12:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-20T17:12:55Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/94174-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to validate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the assessment of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the cirrhotic liver. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with 106 hypervascular focal lesions in the cirrhotic liver who underwent DWI using three b factors and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic MRI followed by SPIO-enhanced MRI were enrolled. Two independent radiologists evaluated two separated image sets (SPIO set, dynamic MRI and SPIO-enhanced T2*-weighted images; DWI set, DWI and dynamic MRI) and assigned confidence levels for diagnosis of HCC using a five-point scale for each lesion. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) was calculated for each image set. RESULTS: The A(z) value of the DWI set was larger than the SPIO set by both readers (reader 1, 0.936 vs. 0.900, P=.050; reader 2, 0.938 vs. 0.905, P=.110). For the sensitivity (reader 1, 93.1% vs. 86.2%, P=.146; reader 2, 95.4% vs. 88.5%, P=.070) and specificity (reader 1, 89.5% vs. 73.7%, P=.250; reader 2, 79.0% vs. 73.7%, P=1.000) of HCC diagnosis, DWI sets were superior to SPIO sets without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: For assessment of hypervascular HCC, DWI in combination with dynamic MRI provides comparable or slightly better information compared with the combination of dynamic and SPIO-enhanced MRI-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1235~1243-
dc.relation.isPartOfMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma,Hepatocellular/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media/pharmacology-
dc.subject.MESHDiffusion Magnetic ResonanceImaging/methods-
dc.subject.MESHFerric Compounds/pharmacology*-
dc.subject.MESHFibrosis/virology-
dc.subject.MESHGadolinium DTPA/pharmacology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLiverCirrhosis/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHLiverNeoplasms/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic ResonanceImaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHObserver Variation-
dc.subject.MESHROC Curve-
dc.subject.MESHRadiology/methods-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleHypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: diffusion-weighted imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Sik Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Joon Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Whang Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mri.2011.07.025-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00951-
dc.contributor.localIdA00345-
dc.contributor.localIdA00369-
dc.contributor.localIdA02500-
dc.contributor.localIdA03712-
dc.contributor.localIdA03740-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02178-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5894-
dc.identifier.pmid21907517-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X11002888-
dc.subject.keywordLiver-
dc.subject.keywordHepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordDiffusion-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance-
dc.subject.keywordSuperparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dae Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dae Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Jin-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume29-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1235-
dc.citation.endPage1243-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.29(9) : 1235-1243, 2011-
dc.identifier.rimsid27288-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.