11 635

Cited 26 times in

Anti-alpha-enolase antibody as a serologic marker and its correlation with disease severity in intestinal Behçet's disease.

Authors
 Sung Jae Shin  ;  Byung Chang Kim  ;  Tae Il Kim  ;  Sang Kil Lee  ;  Kwang Hoon Lee  ;  Won Ho Kim 
Citation
 DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, Vol.56(3) : 812-818, 2011 
Journal Title
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
ISSN
 0163-2116 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Adult ; Antibodies/blood* ; Behcet Syndrome/blood ; Behcet Syndrome/diagnosis* ; Behcet Syndrome/immunology ; Biomarkers/blood ; Chronic Disease ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin M/blood* ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/blood ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology ; Intestinal Diseases/blood ; Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis ; Intestinal Diseases/immunology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phosphopyruvate Hydratase/immunology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Serologic Tests ; Severity of Illness Index
Keywords
Anti-α-enolase antibody ; Disease severity ; Intestinal Behçet’s disease ; Serologic marker
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intestinal Behçet's disease (BD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, as are Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). But unlike CD and UC, serologic markers for intestinal BD are not well known. Recently, anti-α-enolase antibody (AAEA) has been detected in sera from BD patients.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of AAEA in intestinal BD and its clinical correlations.

METHODS: The study sample included 80 patients with intestinal BD and 23 healthy controls. IgM AAEA was detected by ELISA. The positivity of IgM AAEA was defined as an optical density greater than three standard deviations above the mean of the control sera. Other parameters, such as demographic information, subtype of BD, colonoscopic findings, disease severity and treatment modality, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS: The prevalence of IgM AAEA was 67.5% in intestinal BD and 0% in the control group. The positivity rate of IgM AAEA was higher in complete or incomplete BD than in suspected BD (77.5% vs. 51.6%, P = 0.016). The mean HBI score was higher in antibody positive patients than in antibody negative patients (5.60 vs. 4.61, P = 0.003). The cumulative probability of steroid use for aggravation of intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms was higher in antibody positive patients than in antibody negative patients (P = 0.012). The number of patients with systemic involvement was higher in the AAEA positive group than in the negative group.

CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring IgM AAEA may be helpful for diagnosis of intestinal BD and could be used to predict clinical course and disease severity.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10620-010-1326-y
DOI
10.1007/s10620-010-1326-y
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Dermatology (피부과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Byung Chang(김병창)
Kim, Won Ho(김원호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9972
Kim, Tae Il(김태일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-890X
Shin, Sung Jae(신성재)
Lee, Kwang Hoon(이광훈)
Lee, Sang Kil(이상길) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-0364
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/93250
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links