3 662

Cited 51 times in

Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author곽진영-
dc.contributor.author김명현-
dc.contributor.author김민정-
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.contributor.author문희정-
dc.contributor.author윤정현-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T16:29:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-20T16:29:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/92830-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the interobserver variability of elastography on real-time ultrasound and how it influences the agreement of final assessment on ultrasound. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From April to May 2009, 65 breast lesions of 53 patients (mean age, 42.6 years; range, 18-72 years) who underwent ultrasound-guided core biopsy were included in this study. Ultrasound and elastography images of the lesion subjected to biopsy were obtained and prospectively analyzed by three radiologists with individual real-time image scanning prior to biopsy. Each radiologist recorded final ultrasound BI-RADS assessments using ultrasound and combined ultrasound and elastography and the fat-to-lesion ratio and elasticity score. The histopathologic results obtained from ultrasound-guided core biopsy or excision were used as the reference standard. Diagnostic performances and interobserver agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 65 lesions, 43 (66.2%) were benign, and 22 (33.8%) were malignant. Specificity (20.2-33.3%), positive predictive value (38.7-45.1%), and accuracy (46.7-55.4%) were significantly improved in combined ultrasound and elastography (p < 0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) values for all three performers did not show significant differences in ultrasound (AUC, 0.959) and combined ultrasound and elastography (AUC, 0.957) (p = 0.92). Interobserver agreement was not improved with combined ultrasound and elastography (κ = 0.25) in comparison to ultrasound only (κ = 0.37). Interobserver agreement of real-time elastography was fair in both fat-to-lesion ratio (intraclass correlation coefficient score, 0.25) and elasticity score (κ = 0.28). Moderate agreement (κ = 0.46) was seen with static elastography. CONCLUSION: Elastography improves the specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of ultrasound. However, significant interobserver variability exists, with real-time elastographic performance showing fair agreement.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent730~736-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHArea Under Curve-
dc.subject.MESHBiopsy, Needle-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHElasticity Imaging Techniques/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHObserver Variation-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Interventional*-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Mammary*-
dc.titleInterobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hyun Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyung Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Young Kwak-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Jung Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.10100755-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00473-
dc.contributor.localIdA00182-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.contributor.localIdA01397-
dc.contributor.localIdA02595-
dc.contributor.localIdA00428-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00116-
dc.identifier.eissn1546-3141-
dc.identifier.pmid21343520-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ajronline.org/doi/abs/10.2214/AJR.10.4654-
dc.subject.keywordBI-RADS-
dc.subject.keywordbreast-
dc.subject.keywordelastography-
dc.subject.keywordinterobserver variability-
dc.subject.keywordultrasound-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKwak, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myung Hyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Eun Kyung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameMoon, Heui Jeong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYoon, Jung Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKwak, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Eun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorMoon, Heui Jeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYoon, Jung Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Myung Hyun-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume196-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage730-
dc.citation.endPage736-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, Vol.196(3) : 730-736, 2011-
dc.identifier.rimsid28783-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.