9 312

Cited 0 times in

Diffusion-weighted imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI: exclusive and combined values in the assessment of hepatic metastases.

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author유정식-
dc.contributor.author정재준-
dc.contributor.author조은석-
dc.contributor.author김기황-
dc.contributor.author김대중-
dc.contributor.author김주희-
dc.contributor.author김하나-
dc.contributor.author안지현-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T17:27:02Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T17:27:02Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/91431-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The purpose was to validate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the assessment of hepatic metastases compared with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 21 consecutive patients with 160 metastases from extrahepatic malignancy and 25 benign focal lesions, two radiologists evaluated four separate review sessions (I, SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted images; II, precontrast DWI; III, SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted images and precontrast DWI; IV, SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted images plus precontrast and SPIO-enhanced DWI) and assigned confidence levels using a five-grade scale for each hepatic lesion. RESULTS: The A(z) values after receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for Reader 1 and Reader 2 were 0.80 and 0.75 on session I, 0.91 and 0.91 on session II, 0.97 and 0.96 on session III and 0.96 and 0.96 on session IV, respectively. The A(z) value of session II was significantly higher than that of session I (Reader 1, P=.004; Reader 2, P<.001), and that of session III was significantly higher than that of session I (P<.001 for each reader) or session II (Reader 1, P=.004; Reader 2, P=.003). Although there was no significant difference of A(z) value between session III and session IV (Reader 1, P=.231; Reader 2, P=.878), the sensitivity improved for session IV compared with that for session III (Reader 1, P=.031; Reader 2, P=.039). CONCLUSION: In the assessment of hepatic metastases, DWI can provide more accurate information than can SPIO-enhanced images. Diagnostic accuracy can be increased even more through the combination of both techniques.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media*-
dc.subject.MESHDextrans*-
dc.subject.MESHDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms/secondary*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetite Nanoparticles*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHROC Curve-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleDiffusion-weighted imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI: exclusive and combined values in the assessment of hepatic metastases.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHana Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Sik Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Suk Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Joon Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJhii-Hyun Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Whang Kim-
dc.identifier.doi22316590-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00951-
dc.contributor.localIdA01089-
dc.contributor.localIdA02500-
dc.contributor.localIdA03712-
dc.contributor.localIdA03881-
dc.contributor.localIdA00345-
dc.contributor.localIdA00369-
dc.contributor.localIdA02266-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02178-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5894-
dc.identifier.pmid22316590-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X11004693-
dc.subject.keywordDiffusion-weighted MR imaging-
dc.subject.keywordIron oxide-
dc.subject.keywordLiver-
dc.subject.keywordMRLiver-
dc.subject.keywordNeoplasms-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Eun Suk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dae Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ha Na-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameAhn, Jhii Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ha Na-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Eun Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dae Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorAhn, Jhii Hyun-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage554-
dc.citation.endPage561-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.30(4) : 554-561, 2012-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.