3 690

Cited 0 times in

Factors associated with complications of the ureteral stump after proximal ureteroureterostomy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author임영재-
dc.contributor.author정현진-
dc.contributor.author한상원-
dc.contributor.author김명준-
dc.contributor.author이미정-
dc.contributor.author이용승-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T17:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T17:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0022-5347-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/91187-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Ureteroureterostomy is a treatment modality for managing an ectopic ureterocele or ectopic ureter and preserving upper pole kidney function. However, the development of urinary tract infection at the residual ureteral stump is a concern. We analyzed factors affecting the development of urinary tract infection at the residual ureteral stump after proximal ureteroureterostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2009 proximal ureteroureterostomy was performed in 80 patients with ectopic ureterocele or ectopic ureter associated with a duplex system. Excluding 6 patients who did not meet the study inclusion criteria, we investigated age at operation, diameter of the upper pole ureter on ultrasonography, differential renal function and the presence of vesicoureteral reflux in 74 patients. Risk factors for residual ureteral stump infection and decreased differential renal function were analyzed. RESULTS: During a median followup of 5.0 years an additional operation was required in 9 patients (12.2%) due to urinary tract infection at the residual ureteral stump a median of 2.4 years after initial proximal ureteroureterostomy. The preoperative maximal diameter of the upper pole ureter was significantly greater in patients with infection complications. The postoperative maximal diameter of the upper pole ureter was also significantly greater on postoperative ultrasonography performed a median 43.0 days after the operation. Median preoperative and postoperative differential renal function was 47.8% and 47.0%, respectively. No preoperative factors were significantly related to the decrease in differential renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal ureteroureterostomy is a safe treatment for ectopic ureterocele or ectopic ureter with a low postoperative complication rate. Upper pole ureter diameter was correlated with the development of a urinary tract infection at the residual ureteral stump.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1890~1894-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF UROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInfant-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHUreter/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHUreterostomy/adverse effects*-
dc.subject.MESHUreterostomy/methods-
dc.subject.MESHUrinary Tract Infections/etiology*-
dc.titleFactors associated with complications of the ureteral stump after proximal ureteroureterostomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨기과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Seung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoon Soo Hah-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyung-Joon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Jin Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi-Jung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Jae Im-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Won Han-
dc.identifier.doi22998921-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA04285-
dc.contributor.localIdA02774-
dc.contributor.localIdA03387-
dc.contributor.localIdA03772-
dc.contributor.localIdA00425-
dc.contributor.localIdA02980-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01921-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-3792-
dc.identifier.pmid22998921-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534712041912-
dc.subject.keywordureter-
dc.subject.keywordureterocele-
dc.subject.keywordultrasonography-
dc.subject.keywordurinary tract infections-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameIm, Young Jae-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Hyun Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHan, Sang Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myung Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Mi Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Yong Seung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Sang Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Mi Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorIm, Young Jae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Hyun Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Myung Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong Seung-
dc.citation.volume188-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage1890-
dc.citation.endPage1894-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Vol.188(5) : 1890-1894, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid33974-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.