4 676

Cited 0 times in

Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.contributor.author김정아-
dc.contributor.author문희정-
dc.contributor.author손은주-
dc.contributor.author육지현-
dc.contributor.author김민정-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T16:27:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T16:27:03Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/89550-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To develop a scoring system allowing quantification of the probability of malignancy of suspicious microcalcifications based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). METHODS: A total of 163 microcalcification lesions surgically excised in 147 women (aged 28-65 years) were included. Two radiologists independently reviewed each lesion with BI-RADS (4th edition). The interobserver agreement and positive predictive value (PPV) for each descriptor were determined and multivariate analysis was used to develop a scoring system. The scores were compared between benign and malignant lesions and among BI-RADS categories by using the two-sample t-test or the analysis of variance. To assess the discriminative power of the scoring system, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and cutoff values for categorization were determined. For the test of the scoring system, the validation data set from a different facility was applied. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was fair to moderate for distribution, morphology, and category (κ = 0.45, 0.40, and 0.37). PPVs were significantly different among BI-RADS descriptors and categories (P < 0.0001). Of the scoring system developed, the AUC was 0.75. The scores between benign and malignant lesions were significantly different. By means of cutoff values, PPV in category 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5 was 7.0%, 15.0%, 44.8%, and 83.3%, respectively. For the validation data set, the AUC was 0.79 and the PPV in category 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5 was 9.4%, 24.1%, 62.5%, and 80.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In suspicious microcalcifications, our scoring system based on BI-RADS (4th edition) could help to derive a specific final category with good stratification of the probability of malignancy.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHArea Under Curve-
dc.subject.MESHBiopsy, Needle-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Diseases/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Diseases/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Diseases/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCalcinosis/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCalcinosis/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCalcinosis/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHDiagnosis, Differential-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHyperplasia/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLogistic Models-
dc.subject.MESHMammography/standards-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProbability-
dc.subject.MESHROC Curve-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleScoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hyun Youk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ju Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Ah Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung Hyun Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.identifier.doi22173328-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00473-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.contributor.localIdA00888-
dc.contributor.localIdA01397-
dc.contributor.localIdA01988-
dc.contributor.localIdA02537-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00179-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.pmid22173328-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-011-2167-4-
dc.subject.keywordPositive Predictive Value-
dc.subject.keywordDigital Mammography-
dc.subject.keywordNeedle Localization-
dc.subject.keywordLower Positive Predictive Value-
dc.subject.keywordFine Linear-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Eun Kyung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jeong Ah-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameMoon, Heui Jeong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Eun Ju-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYouk, Ji Hyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Eun-Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jeong Ah-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorMoon, Heui Jeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSon, Eun Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYouk, Ji Hyun-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage1491-
dc.citation.endPage1498-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.19(5) : 1491-1498, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid31486-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.