6 600

Cited 40 times in

Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author권혜미-
dc.contributor.author김정아-
dc.contributor.author손은주-
dc.contributor.author육지현-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-18T09:25:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-18T09:25:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/88153-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the interobserver agreement and the diagnostic performance of various qualitative features in shear-wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 153 breast lesions in 152 women who underwent B-mode ultrasound and SWE before biopsy were included. Qualitative analysis in SWE was performed using two different classifications: E values (Ecol; 6-point color score, Ehomo; homogeneity score and Esha; shape score) and a four-color pattern classification. Two radiologists reviewed five data sets: B-mode ultrasound, SWE, and combination of both for E values and four-color pattern. The BI-RADS categories were assessed B-mode and combined sets. Interobserver agreement was assessed using weighted κ statistics. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was substantial for Ecol (κ=0.79), Ehomo (κ=0.77) and four-color pattern (κ=0.64), and moderate for Esha (κ=0.56). Better-performing qualitative features were Ecol and four-color pattern (AUCs, 0.932 and 0.925) compared with Ehomo and Esha (AUCs, 0.857 and 0.864; P<0.05). The diagnostic performance of B-mode ultrasound (AUC, 0.950) was not significantly different from combined sets with E value and with four color pattern (AUCs, 0.962 and 0.954). When all qualitative values were negative, leading to downgrade the BI-RADS category, the specificity increased significantly from 16.5% to 56.1% (E value) and 57.0% (four-color pattern) (P<0.001) without improvement in sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The qualitative SWE features were highly reproducible and showed good diagnostic performance in suspicious breast masses. Adding qualitative SWE to B-mode ultrasound increased specificity in decision making for biopsy recommendation.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/epidemiology*-
dc.subject.MESHElasticity Imaging Techniques/statistics & numerical data*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHObserver Variation-
dc.subject.MESHPrevalence-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Mammary/statistics & numerical data*-
dc.titleClinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Mi Gweon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hyun Youk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ju Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Ah Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.004-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00265-
dc.contributor.localIdA00888-
dc.contributor.localIdA01988-
dc.contributor.localIdA02537-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00845-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7727-
dc.identifier.pmid23988689-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X13004026-
dc.subject.keywordBI-RADS-
dc.subject.keywordBreast masses-
dc.subject.keywordBreast ultrasound-
dc.subject.keywordShear wave-
dc.subject.keywordSonoelastography-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameGweon, Hye Mi-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jeong Ah-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Eun Ju-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYouk, Ji Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorGweon, Hye Mi-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jeong Ah-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSon, Eun Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYouk, Ji Hyun-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume82-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage680-
dc.citation.endPage685-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol.82(11) : 680-685, 2013-
dc.identifier.rimsid33092-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.